Enhancing Quality Management in Indonesia's Flexible Packaging Industry: A Six Sigma Approach to Defect Reduction and Cost Savings

Authors

  • Muhammad Keanoubie Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia
  • Ratih Dyah Kusumastuti Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/jane.v2i1.2025.1726

Keywords:

quality control, six sigma, cost of poor quality, quality contpareto analysis, failure mode effect analysis.

Abstract

Background: The flexible packaging industry is experiencing significant growth, requiring companies to improve efficiency by reducing defects and minimizing the cost of poor quality (COPQ). Effective quality control is crucial to maintaining competitiveness and reducing waste. This study focuses on assessing and improving quality control in an Indonesian flexible packaging company, XYZ, using the Six Sigma methodology. Methods: The research adopts the Six Sigma DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) approach to identify defects and propose solutions. Data collection includes statistical analysis, historical records, and interviews with company sources. The study specifically examines defects in the printing process, which accounts for 79% of total defects based on the 80/20 principle. The Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) model is applied to identify root causes and develop recommendations for improvement. Findings: The study identifies multiple factors contributing to printing defects, such as register shifting, film scratching, color inconsistencies, ink transfer issues, and ink spots. Operator performance and machine-related issues are found to be the dominant causes of defects. Implementing the recommended quality control improvements can potentially reduce defect-related costs by 48%, translating to estimated cost savings of IDR 114,734,847 during the study period. Conclusion: This research confirms the effectiveness of Six Sigma in reducing defects and improving production efficiency in the flexible packaging industry. However, limitations include restricted access to ERP data, reliance on interviews and historical records, and the inability to evaluate the implementation of control measures. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study contributes to the literature by applying Six Sigma in a flexible packaging industry context in Indonesia, demonstrating its potential for substantial cost savings. Unlike previous studies, it emphasizes the human factor in quality control and suggests a systematic approach to defect reduction.

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17, 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Basu, R. (2004). Implementing quality: a practical guide to tools and techniques: enabling the power of operational excellence. Cengage Learning EMEA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570510619518

Benbow, D. W., & Kubiak, T. M. (2005). The certified six sigma black belt handbook. Asq Press.

Blackstone, A. (2006). Principles of sociological inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Saylor Academy Open Textbooks

Clark, T.J. (1999). Success for Quality: Support Guide for Journey to Continuous Improvement, ASQ: Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. (2014). Business research methods. Mcgraw-hill, Boston.

Desai, D. A. (2006). Improving customer delivery commitments the Six Sigma way: case study of an Indian small scale industry. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 2(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCA.2006.009368

Desai, T. N., & Shrivastava, R. L. (2008, October). Six Sigma–a new direction to quality and productivity management. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (Vol. 6). https://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCECS2008/WCECS2008_pp1047-1052.pdf

Evans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (2005). The management and control of quality.

Formoso, C. T., Soibelman, L., De Cesare, C., & Isatto, E. L. (2002). Material waste in building industry: main causes and prevention. Journal of construction engineering and management, 128(4), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:4(316)

Heizer, J. & Render, B. (2014). Operations management. Boston: Prentice Hall, pp. 3- 268.

Ishikawa. K. (1985). Use of Quality Tools, what is Total Quality Control?, 1 st ed, Englewood Cliff, N.J: Prentice Hall.

Juran, J.M. & Godfrey, A.B. (1998). Juran’s Quality Handbook, McGraw-Hill.

Krajewski, L. J., Ritzman, L. P., & Malhotra, M. K. (2013). Operations management. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kumar, S. & N. Suresh. (2008). Production and Operations Management, 2 edn. New Age International (P) Ltd. Publishers, New Delhi.

Kumar, S., & Sosnoski, M. (2009). Using DMAIC Six Sigma to systematically improve shopfloor production quality and costs. International journal of productivity and performance management, 58(3), 254-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400910938850

Liker, J.K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Myeza, Z. (2017). The effects of waste management on profitability in a flexible packaging company (Doctoral dissertation). http://hdl.handle.net/10539/23624

Patel, R. (2012). Modeling Lean Six Sigma in the small packaging industry in India. Rochester Institute of Technology.

Prashar, A. (2014). Adoption of Six Sigma DMAIC to reduce cost of poor quality. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0018

PT Berlina Tbk. (2020). Laporan Tahunan 2019 PT Berlina Tbk. Tangerang.

Sarkar, D. (2009). 8 wastes of lean manufacturing in a service context. Retrieved February, 2020, from http://www.processexcellencenetwork.com/lean-six- sigma-businesstransformation/columns/8-wastes-of-lean-manufacturing-in-a-services-context/

Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International journal of quality & reliability management, 22(9), 986-1004. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710510625248

Simseker, O., Kurt, B., & Arman, E. (2012). Effects of Different Solvents to Printability in Gravure Printing. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 24(11). https://asianpubs.org/index.php/ajchem/article/view/9769

Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2002). Quality management re-visited: a reflective review and agenda for future research. Journal of operations management, 20(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00088-2

Tong, J. P. C., Tsung, F. G., & Yen, B. P. (2004). A DMAIC approach to printed circuit board quality improvement. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 23, 523-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1721-z

United Nations Statistics Division. (1997). Environmantal glossary: Waste management. Retrieved February 2020

Wiesenfelder, H. (2013) The Pareto Principle. Retrieved from Retrieved March, 2020, from http://www.brighthubpm.com/six-sigma/36907-the-pareto-principle-and-its-application-insix-sigma/

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.

Zapartas, Z. (2012). Implementation of the six sigma methodology in the maintenance process of Crown Hellas Can.

Zhao, X. (2011). A Process Oriented Quality Control Approach Based On Dynamic Spc And Fmea Repository. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.23055/ijietap.2011.18.8.108

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Keanoubie, M., & Kusumastuti, R. D. (2025). Enhancing Quality Management in Indonesia’s Flexible Packaging Industry: A Six Sigma Approach to Defect Reduction and Cost Savings. Journal of Entrepreneurial Economic, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.61511/jane.v2i1.2025.1726

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check