Forms and Methods of Communication in Vedic and Hindu Literature: Hermeneutic Studies of Communication Theory

Authors

  • Ni Made Yuliani 1 Hindu State University of I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ni Made Ayu Susanthi Pradnya Paramitha Hindu State University of I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ni Putu Ayu Desi Wulandari Hindu State University of I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v1i1.2023.264

Keywords:

Veda, communication, Sanskrit texts

Abstract

The Vedas are the source of knowledge, as the root word Vid means knowledge. The Sruti Vedas explain the importance of the faculty of speech. Vak (speech) in the Veda is related to Saraswati, namely the ability to speak or vicara (speaking-verbal communication). This research is a qualitative research that focuses on the text. Text research, researchers are dealing with various texts that are ready to be studied and explored. Data obtained through observation and literature study methods. In this case the texts studied are the Vedas and Hindu Literature which are related to the object of research in the field of communication. The theory used is hermeneutics. The Hindu Vedic tradition of thought inherits many philosophical schools, and as such incorporates a wide range of resources that can be studied in relation to the discipline of communication. The need is to explore, reinterpret and re-contextualize texts in a new light. The scope of communication discourse from a Hindu perspective is very broad, but the discourse is limited to a limited domain. Theories and methods of communication are extensively discussed in Sanskrit texts such as Bharata's Nāṭyaśāstra, Bhartrihari's Vakyapadiya, and Panini's Astadhyayi. Likewise, speech and rhetoric are widely discussed in the classic anviksiki texts which are the knowledge of Medhatiti Gautama

References

Adhikary, Nirmala Mani. “Sahridayata in Comuication” Bodhi: An Interdisplinary Journal, Vol. 4 No 1 2010 (hal. 150-160). Terdapat pada:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/bodhi/article/view/5816/4783.

Adhikary, Nirmala Mani. 2009. An Introduction to Sadharanikaran Model of Communication. Bodhi: An Interdisplinary Journal, Vol. 4 No 1 2010 (hal. 69-91). Terdapat pada https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/bohdi/article /view/5816/4783.

Ali, I. H. (2015). Penelitian komunikasi pendekatan kualitatif berbasis teks. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 19(1), 129-139.

Aryadharma, N.K.S (2019). Vedanta dan Metode Pemahaman Filsafat Hindu. Surabaya: Paramita.

Bhuyan, P.R., 2003. Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India. Atlantic : New Delhi.

Bleicher, J. (2017). Contemporary hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy and critique (Vol. 2). Routledge.

Chati, C., Avalokitesvari, N. N. A. N., & Surpi, N. K. (2018). State Defense Diplomacy In Chanakya Viewpoint (Study of Arthashastra Text as a Basis Strategy of Defense Diplomacy). Vidyottama Sanatana: International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies, 2(2), 218-225.

Chattopadhyay, Malyaban (2013) “A Historical Study Of Ancient Indian Theatre-Communication In The Light Of Natyasastra”. Global Media Journal-Indian. Vol. 4 No.1. Tersedia pada: Edition/ISSN 2249-5835 Sponsored by the University of Calcutta/www.caluniv.ac.in, Winter Issue/December 2013/Vol. 4/No. 2.

Datta, Rudrashis. 2013. “Philosophizing Communication: A Reading of Natyasastra”. Global Media Journal-India. Volume 2. No. 4 (hlm.1-12).

Ghosh, Manomohan.1951. The Natyasastra Bharata Muni. Asiatic Society of Bengal: Calcutta.

Hidayatullah, dkk. 2018. “Perilaku Generasi Millennial dalam Menggunakan Aplikasi Go-Food”. Jurnal Manajemen Kewirausahaan, Volume 6, Nomor 2 (hlm.240-249).

Jayaweera, N. (1988). Some tentative Thoughts in communication theory and Adwaita Vedanta. In W. Dissanayake, Communication Theory: The Asian Perspective. Singapore: AMIC.

Kumar, K. 2005. Mass Communication in India (3rd ed.). Bombay: Jaico.

Kuntowijoyo. 1995. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: PT Bentang Pustaka.

Littlejohn, dkk. 2009. “Hindu Commucication Theory”. Dapat diakses pada http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/communicationtheory/n176.xml.

Muni, B. Natya Shastra. Terj. Manomohan Ghosh (1951). Terdapat pada: https://archive.org/details/NatyaShastra.

Narula, U. 2003. Mass Communication Theory and Practice. New Delhi: Har-Ananda Publications.

Prayogi, R. D. (2020). Kecakapan abad 21: Kompetensi digital pendidik masa depan. Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(2).

Rangacharya, Adya., 1996. The Nāṭyaśāstra English Translation With Critical Notes. New Delhi : Munshiram Manoharlal Publisher Pvt Ptd.

Santrock, John. 2012. Life Span Development. 13th Edition. Texax: Mc Graw-Hill.

Saraswati, S. 2011. Vedic Consept of God. Delhi :Vijayakumar Govindaram Hasananda.

Simanjuntak, I. U. V., Darwati, E., Saputri, D. M., Vidyaningtyas, H., Sulistyaningsih, S., & Mahayana, D. (2021). Fenomena Adiksi Internet dan Media Sosial Pada Generasi Xyz. Etnoreflika: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya, 10(3), 290-308.

Sri Satguru. 2003. The Natyasatra of Bharatamuni. Dehli.

Stone, dkk. 2003. Clarifying Communication Theories: A Hands-On Approach. New Delhi: Surjeet Publications.

Surpi, N. K. (2017). Hadapi Tantangan Global, Lembaga Pendidikan Hindu Harus Jadi Gurukula Modern. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 3(2), 171-179.

Surpi, N. K. (2019). The Influence Of Tarkaśāstra Proficiency In The Internal And Interfaith Dialogue Nowadays. Vidyottama Sanatana International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies, 3(2), 250-257.

Surpi, N. K., & Ardana, I. K. (2022). Metode Pembelajaran Filsafat Hindu: Studi Teks Filsafat India Klasik dan Proyeksinya pada Pembelajaran Filsafat Hindu Dewasa ini. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 6(4), 289-304.

Surpi, N. K., & Purwadi, I. K. D. A. (2021). Konsep dasar literasi dalam upaniṣad sebagai upaya peningkatan mutu pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 7.

Surpi, N. K., & Yogiswari, K. S. (2021). Medhātithi Gautama Pendiri Ānvīkṣikī Par Excellence: Relevansinya dengan Bidang Baru Penelitian Filsafat Hindu di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 5(4).

Surpi, N.K.,(2022). Anviksiki Logika, Penalaran, Filsafat Ilmu, Diskusi Debat dan Implikasinya pada Sanatana Dharma. Malang : Mazda.

Tewar, I. 1980. Sadharanikaran: India Communication Theory. Indian and Foreign Review (hlm 13.14).

Thiselton, A. C. (2009). Hermeneutics: an introduction. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior, 72, 577-588.

Warnke, G. (2016). Hermeneutics. In Oxford research encyclopedia of literature.

Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., Nyoto, A., & Malang, U. N. (2016). Transformasi pendidikan abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di era global. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 1, No. 26, pp. 263-278).

Downloads

Published

2023-10-18

How to Cite

Yuliani, N. M., Paramitha, N. M. A. S. P., & Wulandari, N. P. A. D. . (2023). Forms and Methods of Communication in Vedic and Hindu Literature: Hermeneutic Studies of Communication Theory. Dharmakirti : International Journal of Religion, Mind and Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v1i1.2023.264

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check