Ancient Indian epistemology and modern cognitive science: Exploring vedic insights in contemporary thought processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v2i1.2024.1257Keywords:
anviksiki, cognitive science, hindu philosophyAbstract
Background: This article explores the connections between the concept of anviksiki in Hindu philosophy and theories in cognitive science, and how these principles can be applied in modern education. Anviksiki, which focuses on critical thinking and deep reflection, is considered to have strong relevance to cognitive science concepts such as information processing, perception, and decision-making. Methods: The method used in this research is literature study and comparative analysis, by reviewing various literatures that discuss Hindu philosophy and cognitive science in depth. The analysis shows that anviksiki can provide an additional perspective in understanding how humans think and process information, especially in the context of moral and ethical reflection. Finding: In education, the principle of anviksiki that emphasises self-reflection and critical thinking can enrich students' learning process. This concept supports active learning methods that allow students to construct their own understanding, in a way that is in line with Piaget's theory of constructivism. In addition, cognitive science provides practical insights into information processing and memory, which can be used to design more effective teaching strategies. Conclusion: The conclusion of this study confirms that anviksiki can be integrated with cognitive science to create a holistic approach to education, which enriches intellectual, ethical and reflective aspects. By combining Hindu wisdom and cognitive science insights, education can support the development of balanced individuals, who are able to think critically and understand the moral consequences of their decisions. This research reveals that Anviksiki, as a philosophy of critical thinking in the Hindu tradition, has strong relevance to concepts in modern cognitive science, particularly in analytic approaches, logic, and deductive methods. Thus, the heritage of Hindu thought not only demonstrates traditional wisdom but also presents a philosophical foundation that supports contemporary cognitive exploration. Novelty/Originality of this article: This research offers a new perspective by bridging the ancient philosophy of Anviksiki with modern cognitive science, demonstrating the continuity of concepts in the critical thinking process involving logical analysis and deductive methods. It provides new insights in understanding the contribution of the Hindu tradition of thought to the development of cognitive theory today.
References
Aryadharma, N. K. S. (2019). Vedānta dan Metode Pemahaman Filsafat Hindu. Surabaya: Paramita.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). Academic Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Chakrabarti, A. (2019). Classical Indian Philosophy: A Reader. Bloomsbury Academic.
Chattopadhyaya, D. (2017). Induction, Probability, and Skepticism. SUNY Press.
Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer.
Ganeri, J. (2001). Philosophy in classical India: The proper work of reason. Routledge.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. Basic Books.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2001-18918-008
Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and cognition, 28, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.005
Kangle, R. P. (1965). The Kautiliya Arthashastra, Part 1: Sanskrit Text with a Glossary. University of Bombay.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2019). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0043158
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Rao, K. R. (2011). Cognitive Anomalies, Consciousness and Yoga. Matrix Publishers.
Rao, K. R. (2019). Cognitive Anomalies, Consciousness and Yoga. Springer.
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2000-13324-001
Sharma, C. (2000). A critical survey of Indian philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass.
Sternberg, R. J., & Halpern, D. F. (Eds.). (2020). Critical thinking in psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Surpi, N. K. (2022). ANVIKSIKI: Logika, Penalaran, Filsafat Ilmu, Debat-Diskusi dan Implikasinya pada Sanatana Dharma. Mazda Media.
Surpi, N. K., Widiana, I. G. P. G., & Wika, I. M. (2021). Indian Logic (Ānvīkṣikī) As The Light Of Knowledge And Its Relevance To The Learning Of Hindu Philosophy Nowadays. Vidyottama Sanatana International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies, 1.
Untara, I. M. G. S. ., Sumaryani , N. M. ., & Surpi, N. K. . (2024). The Vedic concept of work ethic and its relevance to 21st century competencies. Dharmakirti : International Journal of Religion, Mind and Science, 1(2), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v1i2.2024.610
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). The meeting of meditative disciplines and Western psychology: A mutually enriching dialogue. American Psychologist, 61(3), 227-239. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2006-03947-004
Wariati, N. L. G. ., & Listyaantari. (2024). Vada-Tarka Vidya is a means of improving the intellectual abilities of Hindu students. Dharmakirti : International Journal of Religion, Mind and Science, 1(2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v1i2.2024.533.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dharmakirti : International Journal of Religion, Mind and Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.