Pengelolaan hutan berkelanjutan masyarakat Dayak

Authors

  • Dhunung Mei Fera Program Studi Ilmu Lingkungan, Sekolah Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Indonesia;, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Dyah Ayu Ritma Ratri Program Studi Ilmu Lingkungan, Sekolah Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Indonesia;, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ria Ishardanti Program Studi Ilmu Lingkungan, Sekolah Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Indonesia;, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/esgsb.v1i1.2024.758

Keywords:

Dayak Tribe; deforestation; forest management.

Abstract

Background: Forests are a source of life for the Dayak people. The various activities of the Dayak community towards the forest provide an understanding that the relationship between the Dayak community and the forest is an interaction that is a reciprocal relationship. Forests provide living resources to meet the needs of the Dayak people, and the Dayak people always maintain forest preservation in accordance with their culture. Grouping forests based on their function is a form of Dayak community participation in an effort to map their territory and maintain the sustainability of forest functions considering that the Dayak community's life depends on the forest. The rotational farming system is a way of managing forests for farming that has been carried out for generations by the Dayak people in a natural and traditional way. For the Dayak people, most of whom make their living as farmers, farming activities are the most suitable source of meeting their food needs. Methods: In this study, the author reviews various literature about the lives of the Dayak community in managing sustainable forests. Findings: However, over time, conversion of forest land and population growth has resulted in the conversion of forest land which results in natural damage. Policies that prioritize economic interests such as Forest Tenure Rights (HPH), Industrial Plantation Forests (HTI) change the behavior of the Dayak people and forget their traditional knowledge. Conclusion: Massive clearing of forest areas for industrial areas results in damage to the environment and ecosystem habitat, both biotic and abiotic, one way that becomes a national issue is the simultaneous occurrence of forest and land fires. Local wisdom also cannot maintain the traditional knowledge of the Dayak community which might be a solution to preserving nature. Young people who are expected to be the successors of the heritage appear to be indifferent to cultural preservation that has been proven to be sustainable. The cultural values ​​that are lived are considered a burden on the development of the times.

References

Afendy, A. dkk. (2017). Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Dalam Mengendalikan Api Pada Aktivitas Ladang Berpindah Di Desa Pala Pulau Kecamatan Putussubau Utara Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu. Jurnal Hutan Lestari, 5 (2), 460–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jhl.v5i2.20285

Akbar, A. (2011). STUDI KEARIFAN LOKAL PENGGUNAAN API PERSIAPAN LAHAN: Studi Kasus di Hutan Mawas, Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 8(3), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.20886/jsek.2011.8.3.211-230

Arkanudin. (2001). Perubahan Sosial Peladang Berpindah Dayak Ribun Parindu Sanggau Kalimantan Barat. Universitas Padjadjaran. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS1.INLIS000000000381925/Description

Arkanudin. (2012). Sistem Perladangan Dan Kearifan Tradisional Orang Dayak Dalam Mengelola Sumber Daya Hutan (Shifting cultivation system of Dayak in forest resource management). https://prof-arkan.blogspot.com/2012/04/sistem-perladangan-dan-kearifan_25.html

Barri, M. ., Setiawan, A. A., Oktaviani, A. R., Prayoga, A. P., & Ichsan, A. C. (2018). Deforestasi Tanpa Henti "Potret Deforestasi di Sumatera Utara, Kalimantan Timur, dan Maluku Utara. Bogor. https://fwi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/deforestasi_tanpa_henti_2013-2016_lowress.pdf

Bulkani, Ilham, & Darlan, S. (2019). Pukung pahewan: The effort of natural resources conservation in Dayak Ngaju community. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 314(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/314/1/012042

Concklin, H. (1959). The Study of Shifting Cultivation. Current Anthropology. https://anthro.du.ac.in/e-resources2020/kennedy/Shifting%20cultivation_Anthropological%20Perspectives.pdf

Dove, M. R. (1988). Sistem Perladangan Indonesia; Suatu Studi Kasus Di Kalimantan Barat. Yogyakarta: UGM Press. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Sistem_perladangan_di_Indonesia.html?id=plWkAAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Dwi Fajriyah Suci Anggaraini, Purwoto, A. E. S. A. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perkara Kebakaran Hutan. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5, 3. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.12056

Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(December), 1243–1248. https://pages.mtu.edu/~asmayer/rural_sustain/governance/Hardin%201968.pdf

Iskandar, J. (2002). Changes of the dayak’s forest management caused by the hph/hphh activities in west kutai, east kalimantan. Jurnal Sosiohumaniora, 4(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v4i3.5268

King, V. (1988). Social Rank and Social Change Among the Maloh. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. https://victortking.org/Publications.html

King, V. (1993). Peoples of Borneo. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/1276969

Lontaan, J. U. (1975). Sejarah, hukum adat, dan adat istiadat Kalimantan-Barat. Pontianak: Pemda Tingkat I Kalbar. https://balaiyanpus.jogjaprov.go.id/opac/detail-opac?id=59214

Maunati, Y. (2004). Identitas Dayak: Komodifikasi dan Politik Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta. https://balaiyanpus.jogjaprov.go.id/opac/detail-opac?id=79166

Meyer, A. (1882). Über die Namen Papua, Dajak und Alfuren. Vienna: Adolf Holzhausen. https://www.catatannusantara.com/pustaka/x692en99hlnc5ge-gtgm9-jk8pk-mz6gz-7wyap-w8slg-3ajes-ztbw3-4gjeh-94dhb-ssf3k-zel92-lxspb-ajnbf-j6spm-mme64-g6hrt-2sc95-8jekx

Mubyarto, dkk. (1991). Kajian Sosial Ekonomi Desa-Desa Perbatasan di Kalimantan Timur. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media. https://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20209003&lokasi=lokal

Niezen, R. (2003). The Origins of Indigenism: Human Rights and the Politics of Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520235564/the-origins-of-indigenism

Panayotou, T. (2003). ECONOMIC GROWTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ead/sem/sem2003/papers/panayotou.pdf

Prajna Yogi, I. B. P. (2018). Padi Gunung Pada Masyarakat Dayak, Sebuah Budaya Bercocok Tanam Penutur Austronesia (Melalui Pendekatan Etnoarkeologi). Forum Arkeologi, 31, Nomor, 45–46. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24832/fa.v31i1.456

Reksohadiprojo. (2000). Kajian Identifikasi Potensi dan Permasalahan hutan Kemasyarakatan Di Desa Soakonora Kabupaten Halmahera Barat Propinsi Maluku Utara. Univeristas Nuku. http://scholar.unand.ac.id/68206/4/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf.pdf?jmgdbiecbiecbaaa?cbiecbaaaimopppp?jmglfkfknophdjmo?ppppphlfkfknglno

Respati, R., Azhari, M., & Marlina, S. (2017). The Role of Bahuma Batahutn Local Wisdom to Environmental Conditions of Dayak Tribe. Anterior Jurnal, 17(1), 49–51. https://journal.umpr.ac.id/index.php/anterior/article/download/25/19/94

Samsoedin, W. & S. (2010). Konsep Tata Ruang Dan Pengelolaan Lahan Pada Masyarakat Dayak Kenyah di Kalimantan Timur. Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 7, 145–168. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2010.7.2.145-168

Sapardi. (1991). Pengaruh Perkebunan Inti Rakyat Terhadap Rumah Tangga Petani di Kecamatan Parindu. Universitas Indonesia. https://jurnal.ideaspublishing.co.id/index.php/ideas/article/view/419

Sillander, K., & Alexander, J. (2016). Belonging in Borneo: Refiguring Dayak Ethnicity in Indonesia. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2016.1152882

Singarimbun, M. (1991). Beberapa Aspek Kehidupan Masyarakat Dayak. Jurnal Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.2083

Uluk, A. (2001). Ketergantungan Masyarakat Dayak Terhadap Hutan. Jakarta: Center of International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/994/

Widjono, R. H. (1995). Simpukng Munan Dayak Benuaq, Suatu Kearifan Tradisional Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Hutan. Pontianak. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/degradasi-kearifan-lokal-sistem-pertanian-suku-dayak-29684438/29684438

Widjono, R. H. (1998). Masyarakat Dayak Menatap Hari Esok. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Masyarakat_Dayak_menatap_hari_esok.html?hl=id&id=mV5xAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

World Bank. (2019). Indonesia Economic Quarterly Reports (IEQ). https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia/publication/indonesia-economic-quarterly-reports

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check