Building public trust: Evaluating the effectiveness of digital governance and regulatory policies pawnbroking business
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/esgsb.v3i1.2026.3426Keywords:
digital financial services, digital governance, pawnbroking digitalization, public trust, regulatory effectivenessAbstract
Background: Digital transformation in Indonesia's pawnshop industry has driven significant changes in financial service patterns, ranging from accelerated transaction processes to expanded service inclusion through platforms such as Pegadaian Digital Service and Pegadaian Syariah Digital Service. However, this acceleration has also been accompanied by challenges in the form of regulatory uncertainty, increased digital risks, and variability in public trust influenced by system quality and data protection. This study aims to analyze the interaction between the digitization of pawnshop services, the dynamics of public trust, and the effectiveness of regulations by reviewing previous research developments that show a gap between technological innovation and governance readiness. Methods: This study applies a systematic literature review method with structured searches on a number of national and international academic databases, article selection using identification, screening, and eligibility stages, and thematic analysis to formulate conceptual patterns related to digital service quality, user behavior, and regulatory effectiveness. Findings: The synthesis results show that the reliability of digital systems is the strongest determinant in driving adoption and shaping user trust, while digital literacy acts as a moderating variable that explains differences in acceptance levels between demographic groups. In addition, the current regulatory framework does not adequately regulate remote appraisal practices, data security, guarantee delivery mechanisms, and digital operational standards, resulting in legal uncertainty and weak consumer protection. These findings confirm that the success of digital pawnbroking services is highly dependent on the harmonization of technology quality, user readiness, and regulatory capacity. Conclusion: This study concludes that strengthening digital governance, modernizing regulations, and improving digital literacy are key prerequisites for creating a secure, inclusive, and sustainable digital pawnbroking ecosystem. Novelty/Originality of this article: The uniqueness of this research lies in the development of an integrative conceptual model that combines digitization, public trust, and regulatory effectiveness in a holistic analytical framework, thereby enriching the literature and supporting evidence-based policy formulation in the digital pawnbroking sector.
References
Abubakar L.., & Handayani T.. (2017). Juridical review of regulatory development and pawnshop business as a material security institution. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 2(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.7
Ahmad S.. (2025). Strengthening consumer protection through enhanced risk governance in financial services. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202509.2210.v1
Alfian I. I.., & Siregar E.. (2024). Effectiveness of digital Sharia pawnshop services in increasing the number of customers at Pegadaian Syariah. Journal of Islamic Financial Technology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.24952/jiftech.v2i2.11040
Anand D.. (2024). Customer perception towards digital transaction. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 8(5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM34339
ASEAN Financial Innovation Network. (2023). Digital lending and digital pawning risk landscape in Southeast Asia. AFIN. https://afin.tech
Avrianto A.., & Murwenie I.. (2024). Martin Fishbein’s multiattribute analysis on the use of Pegadaian digital services at PT Pegadaian (Indonesian Pawnshop). Sainteks: Jurnal Sain dan Teknik, 6(2), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.37577/sainteks.v6i02.783
Azmi S. A. R. N.., & Dharma B.. (2023). Application of Pegadaian digital service applications in pawn transactions at PT Pegadaian (Persero) UPC Katamso Medan. AMK: Abdi Masyarakat UIKA, 2(4), 67. https://doi.org/10.32832/amk.v2i4.2145
Barzegari S.., Arpaci I.., & Marznaki Z. H.. (2023). Determining factors affecting nurses’ acceptance of a hospital information system using a modified Technology Acceptance Model 3. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 449–456). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16865-9_35
Beck U.. (1992). From industrial society to the risk society: Questions of survival, social structure and ecological enlightenment. Theory, Culture & Society, 9(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327692009001006
Bruckes M.., Grotenhermen J.-G.., Cramer F.., & Schewe G.. (2019). Paving the way for the adoption of autonomous driving: Institution-based trust as a critical success factor.
Cendana R. J. P.., Makatita R. F.., & Tiwu M. I. H.. (2024). The influence of Pegadaian agent services and digital services on the performance of PT Pegadaian Kupang Branch. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 5(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbfe.v5i2.5714
DeLone W. H.., & McLean E. R.. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Eggink W.. (2023). United Nations Development Programme annual report 2022: The future is... UNDP, 30(1), 4–4. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-04/Annual-Report-2022.pdf
Hanifah A.., Santoso B. S.., & Navianto I.. (2018). The urgency of regulating private pawnshop companies with an online system. Al-Mustashfa: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 3(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.24235/jm.v3i1.2935
Hasibuan A. N.., & Afandi A.. (2025). Is there a proclivity among Muslim millennials to engage with Sharia digital pawnbroking services? International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 8(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.v8i1.22219
Kim H.-N.., Freddolino P. P.., & Greenhow C.. (2023). Older adults’ technology anxiety as a barrier to digital inclusion: A scoping review. Educational Gerontology, 49(12), 1021–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2023.2202080
Kitchenham B.., & Charters S.. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.
Lodge M.., & Wegrich K.. (2012). Managing regulation: Regulatory analysis, politics and policy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Machmud A.., Hidayat Y.., & Ghifari R.. (2024). Is Sharia pawnshop important for Indonesian society: A quadruple helix analysis. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.5031
McKnight D. H.., Carter M.., Thatcher J. B.., & Clay P. F.. (2011). Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 2(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353
Meilani A. R.., Hasibuan N. M.., & Nasution M. L. I.. (2022). Service strategy and implementation of digital Sharia pawnshops in increasing the number of customers in Rantau Prapat. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.53697/emak.v3i3.579
Nailul Hikmi., & Hidayati F.. (2025). System quality and the impact of the use of the Flo application on free association within the community in Padang City using the DeLone and McLean method. Professional Evidence-Based Research and Advances in Wellness and Treatment, 2(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.69855/perawat.v2i1.113
Nikolopoulos F.., & Likothanassis S.. (2018). A complete evaluation of the TAM3 model for cloud computing technology acceptance. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 289–296). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02671-4_17
Oktania A.., Silfani F. D.., Irsyad F. R.., & Purba B.. (2025). Analysis of the role of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in ensuring law enforcement of non-bank private pawnshop companies. Jurnal Publikasi Ekonomi dan Akuntansi, 5(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.51903/jupea.v5i3.4189
Peikari H. R.. (2010). The influence of security statement, technical protection, and privacy on satisfaction and loyalty: A structural equation modeling approach. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 223–231). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15717-2_24
Pratama A. B.. (2025). When trust coexists with mistrust: An ethnographic account of the consequences of digitalization project. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(7), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2368253
PwC Singapore. (2024). FinTech in ASEAN 2024: A decade of innovation. https://www.pwc.com/sg/en/publications/fintech-in-asean-2024.html
Radiany M. A.. (2025). Predicting user adoption of digital payment platforms: A quantitative analysis based on UTAUT. KINDAI, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.35972/kindai.v21i2.2437
Ramesh D. K.., & Hariharan A.. (2025). Trust, security, and ease of use in e-banking: A conceptual approach to customer loyalty. International Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management, 4(9), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ISJEM05023
Saputra D.., & Santiago F.. (2023). The urgency of regulating digital pawn innovation in increasing business and efficiency of the pawn industry in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2nd Multidisciplinary International Conference (MIC 2022), Semarang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-11-2022.2327297
Setiawan I.., Rusmani., & Nurhaeti. (2023). Implementation of the compilation of Islamic economic law in Sharia pawn in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(4), 910–921. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i4.1349
Setyawan A.. (2022). Pawnshop digital service quality and its implication on customer satisfaction at PT Pegadaian (Persero) Pondok Labu Branch. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 3(8), 1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v3i08.665
Sun W.. (2024). The development and challenges of digital government in the intelligent era. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 3(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v3n1.08
Thomas J.., & Harden A.. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tri Astuti Andayani. (2025). Supervision of online lending transactions by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) based on POJK Number 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning information technology-based lending and borrowing services. Consensus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.46839/consensus.v4i1.1454
Van Dijk J.. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Velankar S.. (2025). Decoding millennial preferences: Drivers of OTT platform adoption in the digital era. International Journal of Advanced Research, 13(8), 480–484. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/21537
Wibowo U. Y.., & Warka M.. (2022). Legal protection of consumers in gold buying and selling through electronic information and transactions. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(3), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.68
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarinah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










