Tax policy and green sukuk in closing the sustainable finance gap
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/esgsb.v2i2.2025.2708Keywords:
carbon tax, green financing, green sukukAbstract
Background: Indonesia faces a significant climate financing gap, while existing fiscal instruments have not yet produced consistent reductions in financing costs or clearly measurable environmental outcomes. This study aims to propose an integrated mechanism that links environmental tax revenues with green sukuk, drawing on insights from the literature on green bond governance, risk-premium theory, climate budget tagging, and outcome-based budgeting to address persistent issues of project readiness, investor risk perception, and impact verification. Methods: The study applies a descriptive-analytical approach supported by quantitative modeling using 2018–2024 historical data on carbon tax potential, green sukuk yields, issuance volume, and selected outcome indicators, complemented by a theoretical review of the above frameworks. Findings: The analysis indicates that allocating 0.5–1% of environmental tax revenue into a Green Financing Reserve can reduce perceived risk, potentially lowering yields by 10–25 basis points and expanding issuance capacity, while improving project execution through milestone-based disbursement. This pattern is consistent with the theory that credible risk buffers and verifiable outcomes can compress risk premia and strengthen the causal chain from earmarked revenue to financing efficiency and environmental results (e.g., emission reduction and renewable energy deployment). Conclusion: The Carbon Tax–Backed Green Bond Enhancement Model offers a fiscally disciplined and outcome-oriented framework to enhance both the affordability and effectiveness of green sukuk as a climate financing instrument. Novelty/Originality of this article: This article introduces an integrated model that systematically links carbon tax revenues with sovereign green sukuk risk mitigation through a dedicated fiscal reserve aligned with syariah governance, offering a replicable and evidence-based mechanism for narrowing national climate financing gaps.
References
Asian Development Bank. (2021). Detailed guidance for issuing green bonds in developing countries. https://doi.org/10.22617/TIM210521-2
Bachelet, M. J., Becchetti, L., & Manfredonia, S. (2019). The green bonds premium puzzle: The role of issuer characteristics and third-party verification. Sustainability, 11(4), 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041098
Bank Indonesia. (2024). Investor relation unit Republic of Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/en/iru/presentation/default.aspx
Bappenas. (2020). Rencana pembangunan jangka panjang nasional (RPJPN) 2020–2045.
Black, S., Zhunussova, K., & Parry, I. (2022). Carbon taxes or emissions trading systems? Staff Climate Notes, 2022(006), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400212307.066
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Caselli, F., Lagerborg, A., & Medas, P. (2024). Green fiscal rules? Challenges and policy alternatives. Washington, DC.
Chen, H., et al. (2023). Pledgeability and asset prices: Evidence from the Chinese corporate bond markets. The Journal of Finance, 78(5), 2563–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13266
Cheng, G. (2024). Sovereign green bonds: A catalyst for sustainable debt market development? IMF Working Papers, 2024(120), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400277030.001
CICERO. (2018). Second opinion on the Republic of Indonesia’s green bond and green sukuk framework.
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2024). Sustainable debt global state of the market 2023.
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2025). Sustainable debt global state of the market 2024.
Cortellini, G., & Panetta, I. C. (2021). Green bond: A systematic literature review for future research agendas. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120589
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.).
Department of Economic Affairs India. (2022). Framework for sovereign green bonds.
Dorfleitner, G., Utz, S., & Zhang, R. (2022). The pricing of green bonds: External reviews and the shades of green. Review of Managerial Science, 16(3), 797–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00458-9
Hayes, A. (2025). Understanding risk premiums: Boosting returns for risky investments. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/riskpremium.asp
High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. (2017). Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. World Bank.
International Capital Market Association (ICMA). (2021). Green bond principles: Voluntary process guidelines for issuing green bonds.
Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR). (2022). Indonesia sustainable finance outlook 2023. Jakarta.
Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB). (2009). Guiding principles on conduct of business for institutions offering Islamic financial services.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Islamic Financial Services Board. (2023). Islamic financial services industry stability report 2023. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Macmillan.
Klenert, D., Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., & Mattauch, L. (2018). Environmental taxation, inequality and Engel’s law: The double dividend of redistribution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71(3), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0070-y
Löffler, K. U., Petreski, A., & Stephan, A. (2021). Drivers of green bond issuance and new evidence on the “greenium.” Eurasian Economic Review, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-020-00165-y
Marten, M., & van Vender, K. (2019). The use of revenues from carbon pricing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3cb265e4-en
Ministry of Finance Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Green sukuk allocation and impact report 2023.
Malaysian Sustainable Finance Initiative (MSFI). (n.d.). SRI sukuk and bond scheme. https://www.msfi.com.my/incentives-sri-sukuk-and-bond-grant-scheme/
Mujizat, D. A. (2021). The sovereign green sukuk: An analysis of its process and barriers to funding renewable energy projects in Indonesia (Master’s thesis, Uppsala University).
National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS). (n.d.). Carbon tax. https://www.nccs.gov.sg/singapores-climate-action/mitigation-efforts/carbontax/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Green budget tagging: Introductory guidance & principles. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fe7bfcc4-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Green, social, sustainability and sustainability-linked bonds in developing countries. https://doi.org/10.1787/22d93a4d-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Scaling up the mobilisation of private finance for climate action in developing countries. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/17a88681-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). Aligning finance with climate goals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/aa7c23b2-en
Panizza, U., Weder di Mauro, B., Shi, S., & Gulati, M. (2025). The sovereign greenium: Big promise but small price effect. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5713824
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. Macmillan and Co.
Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Law No. 7 of 2021 on the harmonisation of tax regulations.
Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Regulation of the President of the Republic of Indonesia No. 98 of 2021 on the implementation of carbon pricing to achieve the nationally determined contribution target and control over greenhouse gas emissions in national development.
Reuters. (2023). India sells first green bonds at 5–6 basis points below sovereign yields. The Times of India.
Sasongko, A., & Sakti, A. (2020). Sovereign green sukuk: Environmental risk model development.
Securities Commission Malaysia. (2022). Expansion of SRI sukuk and bond grant scheme to facilitate sustainable finance. https://www.sc.com.my/resources/media/media-release/expansion-of-sri-sukuk-and-bond-grant-scheme-to-facilitate-sustainable-finance
International Capital Market Association (ICMA). (2024). Handbook: Harmonised framework for impact reporting.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2024). The potential growth and future trends of green sukuk as a tool for sustainable financing. https://www.undp.org/publications/potential-growth-and-future-trends-green-sukuk-tool-sustainable-financing
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2022). Nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement.
World Bank. (2024). State and trends of carbon pricing 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/41544
World Bank. (2021). Carbon pricing for climate action. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ec252205-01c5-5a5b-807e-f848b42d22cc/content
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Radhitiya Wicaksana, Silvia Rahmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
