Silo mentality in bureaucratic reform

Authors

  • Eldest Armyrianti Surono Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University 17 August 1945, Jl. Sunter Permai Raya, North Jakarta 14350, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/emagrap.v2i1.2024.972

Keywords:

administrative reform, bureaucracy, silo mentality

Abstract

Background: This article discusses how to overcome silo mentality in bureaucratic reform in an organisation. Method: The qualitative research method is based on case studies and literature reviews. This method involves a critical and in-depth evaluation of previous research to understand sectoral ego and silo mentality in organizational contexts, including government and corporate settings. Findings: There are several things that can be done, one of which is by implementing a better mental revolution based on the values of Pancasila which is the basic ideology of the Indonesian nation. Sectoral ego and silo mentality have the potential to be counterproductive to the strategy of achieving organisational targets and goals. Nonetheless, in the preparation of organisational plans and strategies, it has become customary that organisations set performance targets for each unit derived from the organisation's main targets and objectives. It is an interesting discussion considering that each person or organisational unit always tries and focuses on the respective performance targets that have been set. Conclusion: In some conditions, the choice to focus on their own performance targets is one of the reasons why people exhibit sectoral ego behaviour with silo mentality. By revolutionising the mentality as a strong foundation, it is expected that an organisation can achieve the organisational goals that have been set. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study integrates Pancasila values ​​into strategies to overcome the silo mentality in bureaucratic reform. This innovative approach offers practical solutions to align individual performance with organizational goals, applicable in the Indonesian government and private sectors.

References

Amalia, S. (2018). Bureaucratic reform 4.0: Strategies for facing the industrial revolution 4.0. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja Dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 21(2).

Caiden, G. E. (2017). Administrative reform. Routledge.

Cilliers, F., & Greyvenstein, H. (2012). The impact of silo mentality on team identity: An organisational case study. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v38i2.993

Daraba, D. (2019). Bureaucratic reform & public service.

Desmita, D. (2016). Mental revolution and work ethic revolution: Efforts to build a more dignified Indonesian nation. Ta'dib, 18(1), 1–12. https://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jt.v18i1.273

Diamond, M. A., & Allcorn, S. (2009). Private Selves in Public Organizations: The Psychodynamics of Organizational Diagnosis and Change. Palgrave Macmillan.

Dixit, A. (2012). Bureaucracy, its reform and development. Review of Market Integration, 4(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974929212465682

Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Public bureaucracy reform in Indonesia. UGM Press.

Dwiyanto, A. (2022). Public administration theory and its application in Indonesia. UGM Press.

Gaus, N., Sultan, S., & Basri, M. (2017). State bureaucracy in Indonesia and its reforms: An overview. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179

Gilbert, P. (2014). Mindful compassion: How the science of compassion can help you understand your emotions, live in the present, and connect deeply with others. New Harbinger Publications.

Hetharie, J. A., & Rieuwpassa, A. (2022). Literature review on the role of knowledge transfer in the context of multinational companies. Journal of Business Application, 1(2), 53–71.

Indarti, C. F. S. (2021). Flexibility working arrangement as a bureaucratic reform agenda for work efficiency. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration (IJPA), 7(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.52447/ijpa.v7i2.5171

Kristiawan, M. (2016). A review of mental revolution and character education in the formation of smart and noble Indonesian human resources. Ta'dib, 18(1), 13–25. https://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jt.v18i1.274

Molek, N., de Jager, J. E., & Pucelj, M. (2023). Hero culture and silo mentality: A systematic literature review. RUO: Revija za Univerzalno Odlicnost, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2023.001

Mohapeloa, T. (2017). Effects of silo mentality on corporate ITC's business model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1009–1019). https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0105

Saifuddin, R. (2021). The effect of pandemic on governance: Case study of public services of Lampung provincial government. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 9(3), 219–219. https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v9i03.272

Sidabutar, V. T. P. (2020). Study of the implementation of corporate university in developing the competence of human resources of the state civil apparatus. urnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja, 46(1), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.33701/jipwp.v46i1.814

Sulaiman, A. A., Simatupang, P., Subagyono, K., Setiawan, B. I., Andayani, A., Herodian, S., & Hakim, M. L. (2017). Red and white food self-sufficiency: Erasing sectoral ego. IAARD Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Surono, E. A. (2024). Silo mentality in bureaucratic reform. Economic Military and Geographically Business Review, 2(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.61511/emagrap.v2i1.2024.972

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check