Exploring how blockchain transparency and bullion business synergy foster trust in Islamic gold tokenization among digitally literate urban Muslims in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/emagrap.v4i1.2026.3362Keywords:
blockchain, bullion business, Islamic gold tokenizationAbstract
Background: Background: The rapid development of blockchain technology has encouraged the emergence of Islamic gold tokenization as an innovative Sharia-compliant digital financial instrument. However, public trust in blockchain-based Islamic financial products remains a critical challenge, particularly among urban Muslim investors in emerging markets such as Indonesia. Methods: This study investigates the effects of blockchain transparency and bullion business synergy on trust in Islamic gold tokenization, with digital literacy acting as a moderating variable. The research adopts a quantitative explanatory design grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Trust-Based Adoption Theory. Data were collected through online surveys from 376 urban Muslim respondents in Indonesia and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings: The results demonstrate that blockchain transparency, bullion business legitimacy, and digital literacy each have positive and significant effects on trust in Islamic gold tokenization. In addition, digital literacy significantly strengthens the relationships between blockchain transparency and trust, as well as between bullion business legitimacy and trust. These findings indicate that digitally literate investors tend to place greater trust in blockchain-based Islamic financial products supported by tangible gold assets. Conclusion: The study concludes that trust in Islamic gold tokenization is shaped not only by technological transparency and asset-backed legitimacy but also by the level of users’ digital literacy. Strengthening digital literacy can therefore enhance public confidence in Sharia-compliant fintech ecosystems. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study contributes to the Islamic fintech literature by empirically examining digital literacy as a moderating variable in the relationship between blockchain transparency, bullion business legitimacy, and trust in Islamic gold tokenization. The study also provides a contextual contribution by focusing on urban Muslim investors in Indonesia and the integration of blockchain transparency with bullion-backed Islamic digital finance.
References
Alsaghir, M. (2025). Digital risks and Islamic FinTech: a road map to social justice and financial inclusion. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 16(7), 1265–1282.https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2022-0262
Alzoubi, H. M., & Aziz, R. (2021). Does emotional intelligence contribute to quality of strategic decisions? The mediating role of open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020130
Baita, A. J., & Lukito, S. (2024). Islamic Digital Currency and Entrepreneurship. In Decentralized Finance: The Impact of Blockchain-Based Financial Innovations on Entrepreneurship (pp. 77–93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49515-1_5
Boukis, A. (2020). Exploring the implications of blockchain technology for brand–consumer relationships: a future research agenda. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2018-1780
Chang, C.-Y., & Kuo, H.-C. (2025). The development and validation of the digital literacy questionnaire and the evaluation of students’ digital literacy. Education and Information Technologies, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13216-7
FakhrHosseini, S., Chan, K., Lee, C., Jeon, M., Son, H., Rudnik, J., & Coughlin, J. (2024). User adoption of intelligent environments: A review of technology adoption models, challenges, and prospects. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(4), 986–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2118851
Hasan, H. A., Razaq, A. R., & Sa’aid, H. B. (2026). The challenges of literacy, inclusion, and public trust in the digital Islamic banking ecosystem: An urban context study in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 12(1), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art7
Hassan, A., AlMaghaireh, A. I., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Islamic financial markets and institutions. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321207
Iqbal, Z., & Mirakhor, A. (2017). Ethical dimensions of Islamic economics and finance. In Ethical dimensions of islamic finance: Theory and practice (pp. 103–134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66390-6
Jailani, M. A., & Muneeza, A. (2023). Crypto assets: The need for Shariah screening criteria for digital assets in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Research, 1, 27–47. https://doi.org/10.53840/ijiefer111
Khaliq, A. (2025). Ethical and Sustainable Finance: Integrating Islamic Principles. In Islamic Finance and Sustainable Development (pp. 113–141). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003505570-8
Laili, N. H., Khairi, K. F., & Ahmad, A. (2024). Blockchain Integration: Transforming Islamic Frozen Estate Management in Malaysia. In Strategic Islamic Business and Management: Solutions for Sustainability (pp. 35–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61778-2_12
Li, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). Governing decentralized autonomous organizations as digital commons. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 21, e00450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00450
Maghyereh, A., Awartani, B., & Hassan, A. (2018). Can gold be used as a hedge against the risks of Sharia-compliant securities? Application for Islamic portfolio management. Journal of Asset Management, 19(6), 394–412. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-018-0090-y
Mohemed, R. E., Saleh, A. I., Abdelrazzak, M., & Samra, A. S. (2017). Energy-efficient routing protocols for solving energy hole problem in wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 114, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.12.011
Mokodompis, I. I., Pedju, R. P., & Muhammad, A. A. (2024). Integrating Islamic Law and Modern Regulation: Cryptocurrency as a Sharia-Compliant Digital Asset in Indonesia. Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics, 1(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.63077/r27rd104
Napitupulu, J. H., Panggabean, M. L., Panjaitan, H., & Widiarty, W. S. (2025). An Integrated Legal Framework for Digital Investment Fraud Prevention in Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI), 3(3), 540–567. https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v3i3.154
Nieto, A. T. (2025). Blockchain, non-fungible tokens (NFT) ownership certification of gold reserves and potential contribution to sustainable mining. Earth Science Informatics, 18(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01835-8
Raddatz, N., Coyne, J., Menard, P., & Crossler, R. E. (2023). Becoming a blockchain user: understanding consumers’ benefits realisation to use blockchain-based applications. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1944823
Rahman, M. M. (2025). Blockchain for Halal Integrity in Health Care: Enhancing Compliance, Ensuring Benefits. In Using Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Settings (pp. 232–262). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1001
Risman, A., Markonah, M., Mubarok, J., & Saputra, B. L. E. (2024). The Islamic perspective of gold-based investment: The case of Indonesia. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.30993/tifbr.v18i1.363
Ryu, H.-S. (2018). What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech?: the moderating effect of user type. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 541–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2017-0325
Saputra, W. (2025). Development of digital green waqf for social sustainability in Riau, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(3), 636–670. https://doi.org/10.63822/ear7k474
Setiawan, A. (2024). Ethical decision-making in educational leadership: Insights from Islamic scholars. Edu Spectrum: Journal of Multidimensional Education, 1(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.70063/eduspectrum.v1i1.29
Tao, D., Fu, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, T., & Qu, X. (2022). Key characteristics in designing massive open online courses (MOOCs) for user acceptance: An application of the extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(5), 882–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1695214
Vazquez Melendez, E. I., Bergey, P., & Smith, B. (2024). Blockchain technology for supply chain provenance: increasing supply chain efficiency and consumer trust. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(4), 706–730. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2023-0383
Wang, Z., Yu, L., & Zhou, L. (2025). Navigating the blockchain-driven transformation in industry 4.0: opportunities and challenges for economic and management innovations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 3507–3549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02007-7
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
Xu, J., Le, K., Deitermann, A., & Montague, E. (2014). How different types of users develop trust in technology: A qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology. Applied Ergonomics, 45(6), 1495–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012
Yermack, D. (2017). Donor governance and financial management in prominent US art museums. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(3), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-017-9290-4
Zakir, M. A. bin M., Zakaria, M. Z. bin, Salleh, A. Z., Ismail, A. M., Hasbullah, M., & Majid, M. N. A. (2023). Digital gold investment platform in shariah perspective: A case study of quantum metal. In Digitalization in Halal Management (pp. 47–64). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5146-8_4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sumar'in, Mokmin Basri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
