A multi-hazard approach to disaster-resilient and sustainable infrastructure development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/calamity.v3i2.2026.3290Keywords:
disaster infrastructure, disaster risk reduction, resilience, sustainable developmentAbstract
Background: Indonesia is highly vulnerable to natural disasters, making the development of disaster-resilient and sustainable infrastructure a strategic necessity for disaster risk reduction and long-term development. This study aims to examine the concepts, principles, and challenges of developing resilient and sustainable disaster infrastructure based on recent literature. Methods: The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach through a literature review of scientific journal articles, policy reports, and publications from national and international institutions. Finding: The findings indicate that infrastructure resilience is not solely determined by physical strength but also by the integration of disaster risk analysis, sustainability-oriented planning, and adaptive governance and innovation. Multi-hazard risk-based approaches and the use of digital technologies play a significant role in enhancing the effectiveness of disaster infrastructure development. However, major challenges remain in terms of institutional capacity and coordination among stakeholders. Conclusion: This study concludes that the development of resilient and sustainable disaster infrastructure requires an integrated approach that combines technical, policy, social, and environmental aspects to support inclusive and sustainable development. Novelty/Originality of this article: This article contributes originality by synthesizing recent literature to frame disaster-resilient and sustainable infrastructure as an integrated multi-hazard system that combines engineering resilience, digital technologies, and adaptive governance, offering a comprehensive perspective aligned with contemporary disaster technology and engineering challenges.
References
Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography.
Argyroudis, S. A., Mitoulis, S. Α., Winter, M. G., & Kaynia, A. M. (2019). Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: State-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 191, 106567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106567
Azmiyati, U., & Poernomo, N. S. (2019). Penilaian Risiko Multi Bencana di Jakarta, Indonesia. JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 4(5), 276-280. https://doi.org/10.58258/JUPE.V4I5.811
Azzahra, R., Syamsudin, F., & Subiyanto, S. (2025). Analisis Risiko Multi Bahaya Dan Opsi Pengelolaan Pesisir Di Kecamatan Cidaun Kabupaten Cianjur. Jurnal Geologi Kelautan, 23(1), 46-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.32693/jgk.23.1.2025.923
Bank, W. (2020). Inclusive Resilient Infrastructure Systems.
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., ... & Welle, T. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Natural hazards, 67(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., ... & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake spectra, 19(4), 733-752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., & Bruneau, M. (2010). Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Engineering structures, 32(11), 3639-3649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
Cutter, S. L. (2020). Community resilience, natural hazards, and climate change: Is the present a prologue to the future?. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 74(3), 200-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1692066
Damaševičius, R., Bacanin, N., & Misra, S. (2023). From sensors to safety: Internet of Emergency Services (IoES) for emergency response and disaster management. Journal of sensor and actuator networks, 12(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan12030041
El‐Maissi, A. M., Kassem, M. M., & Nazri, F. M. (2024). Resilient critical infrastructures: An innovative methodological perspective for critical infrastructure (CI) integrated assessment models by inducing digital technologies during multi-hazard incidents. MethodsX, 12, 102561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102561
Francis, R., & Bekera, B. (2014). A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliability engineering & system safety, 121, 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
Hallegatte, S. (2021). Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/111181560974989791/pdf/Lifelines-The-Resilient-Infrastructure-Opportunity.pdf
Harahap, R., Masselink, G., & Boulton, S. J. (2025). A coastal risk analysis for the outermost small islands of Indonesia: A multiple natural hazards approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 121, 105377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105377
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
Joshi, D., Takeuchi, W., Kumar, N., & Avtar, R. (2024). Multi-hazard risk assessment of rail infrastructure in India under local vulnerabilities towards adaptive pathways for disaster resilient infrastructure planning. Progress in Disaster Science, 21, 100308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100308
Linkov, I., Eisenberg, D. A., Plourde, K., Seager, T. P., Allen, J., & Kott, A. (2013). Resilience metrics for cyber systems. Environment Systems and Decisions, 33(4), 471-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9485-y
Mühlhofer, E., Koks, E. E., Kropf, C. M., Sansavini, G., & Bresch, D. N. (2023). A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 234, 109194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2023.109194
Ogie, R. I., Perez, P., & Dignum, V. (2017). Smart infrastructure: an emerging frontier for multidisciplinary research. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-smart infrastructure and construction, 170(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.16.00002
Pescaroli, G. (2021). Cascading disasters and resilience planning. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.
Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2018). Understanding compound, interconnected, interacting, and cascading risks: a holistic framework. Risk analysis, 38(11), 2245-2257. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13128
Rachman, M. G., Zelvany, Z. T., Favali, F. E., & Nugraha, M. R. A. P. (2025). Analisis risiko kebencanaan Indonesia untuk mendukung kebijakan publik. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management, 8(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.35166/jipm.v8i1.99
Sharifi, A. (2020). Urban resilience assessment: Mapping knowledge structure and trends. Sustainability, 12(15), 5918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155918
Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2022). Smart cities and climate-resilient urban planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(5), 1347–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221102400
Tasya, Z. (2025). Resiliensi : Jurnal Mitigasi dan Adaptasi Bencana. Integrating Digital Innovation and Governance to Strengthen Infrastructure Resilience, 1, 43–57.
Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341-363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618
Ugliotti, F. M., Daud, M., & Iacono, E. (2025). Spatial Insights for Building Resilience: The Territorial Risk Management & Analysis Across Scale Framework for Bridging Scales in Multi-Hazard Assessment. Smart Cities, 8(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8010027
UN-Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisioning the Future of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf
UNDR. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030
UNDRR. (2017). The Sendai Framework Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. "Resilience". United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/resilience
UNDRR. (2023). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/gar
UNSD. (2023). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. United Nations Statistics Division. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/
Vale, L. J. (2014). The politics of resilient cities: whose resilience and whose city?. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
Verschuur, J., Koks, E. E., Li, S., & Hall, J. W. (2023). Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00656-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Clairine Fedhora, Oktaviani Novitasari, Visky Alfani; Eka Fauzia, Alidyatul Masruroh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
