Optimization of palm oil biodiesel production: Environmental impact analysis and POME waste utilization

Authors

  • Ari Kabul Paminto Environmental Science Study Program, School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424, Indonesia
  • Mahawan Karuniasa Environmental Science Study Program, School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424, Indonesia
  • Evi Frimawaty Environmental Science Study Program, School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/aes.v2i1.2024.820

Keywords:

biodiesel, life cycle assessment, CO2 (eq) emissions, acidification, eutrophication

Abstract

Background: Indonesia is still an energy importer, especially in the form of crude oil and fuel products to meet the needs of its industrial sector. The reduced production of fossil energy, especially oil, as well as the global commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, has prompted the Indonesian government to continue to support the role of new and renewable energy. The production of palm oil-based biodiesel is faced with a number of environmental problems, which may occur from the release of emissions during the production of FFB (Fresh Fruit Bunches), CPO (Crude Palm Oil), and biodiesel. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to compile an LCI (Life Cycle Inventory) covering the production of FFB, CPO, and biodiesel; analyze the environmental impact of the CPO bodysel production process which includes CO2 (eq) emissions, acidification and eutrophication; and develop a life cycle concept for biodiesel production from palm oil as a renewable energy. Methods: The method used in this study is a combination of quantitative LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) and AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and qualitative. Findings: The results of this study are LCI in 1 ton of biodiesel consisting of NPK fertilizer of 141.1 Kg; herbicide (0.25 Kg); water (1578 m3), diesel oil (25 Kg); fresh fruit bunches of 5.67 tons; electricity of 33.8 kWh, POME (Palm Oil Mill Effluent) (3,47 m3), CPO needed for biodiesel conversion of 1.17 tons; methanol (0.41 tons), and 0.01 tons of Sodium Hydroxide. The total CO2 emission (eq) of biodiesel production from palm oil is 1489 Kg CO2 (eq), eutrophication is 1.12 Kg PO43- (eq) and acidification is 3.06 Kg SO2 (eq). With the largest contribution of CO2 (eq) emissions in CPO production and the contribution of eutrophication and acidification in oil palm plantations or FFB production (Fresh Fruit Bunches). Environmental hotspot of LCA, CO2 (eq) emissions from palm oil biodiesel production show that 53% mainly comes from POME (Palm Oil Mill Effluent) waste, other contributors are NPK fertilizers (23%), methanol (18%), and diesel oil (7%). Hotspot eutrophication showed that 61% mainly came from NPK fertilizer, methanol (20%), diesel oil (11%), and POME waste (8%). Hotspot acidification showed that 48% mainly came from NPK fertilizers, methanol (28%), POME waste (13%), and diesel oil (11%). Conclusion: The concept of a biodiesel production life cycle can be applied with the best alternative utilization of POME waste with a priority weighting of 0.357 and a CO2(eq) emission criterion of 0.494. From the optimization of the life cycle of biodiesel production with the use of POME, the potential for emission reduction is 667.2 Kg CO2 (eq). Novelty/Originality of this Study: This study's novel application of LCA evaluates the environmental impacts of biodiesel production from palm oil in Indonesia, identifying critical hotspots in CO2 emissions, eutrophication, and acidification. Additionally, it proposes an innovative optimization approach by utilizing POME to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, highlighting a viable path for enhancing the sustainability of biodiesel production.

References

Ali, H. S., Nathaniel, S. P., Uzuner, G., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2020). Trivariate modelling of the nexus between electricity consumption, urbanization and economic growth in Nigeria: fresh insights from Maki Cointegration and causality tests. Heliyon, 6(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03400

Alola, A. A., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 685, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139

Ayompe, L. M., Schaafsma, M., & Egoh, B. N. (2021). Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914

Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104

Bórawski, P., Bełdycka-Bórawska, A., Szymańska, E. J., Jankowski, K. J., Dubis, B., & Dunn, J. W. (2019). Development of renewable energy sources market and biofuels in The European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.242

Correa, D. F., Beyer, H. L., Fargione, J. E., Hill, J. D., Possingham, H. P., Thomas- Hall, S. R., & Schenk, P. M. (2019). Towards the implementation of sustainable biofuel production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.005

Dalpaz, R., Konrad, O., Cândido da Silva Cyrne, C., Panis Barzotto, H., Hasan, C., & Guerini Filho, M. (2020). Using biogas for energy cogeneration: An analysis of electric and thermal energy generation from agro-industrial waste. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 40(67). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100774

Danish, Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO 2 emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 678, 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028

Darda, S., Papalas, T., & Zabaniotou, A. (2019). Biofuels journey in Europe: Currently the way to low carbon economy sustainability is still a challenge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.147

Dey, S., Reang, N. M., Das, P. K., & Deb, M. (2020). A comprehensive study on prospects of economy, environment, and efficiency of palm oil biodiesel as a renewable fuel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124981

Dunn, J. B. (2019). Biofuel and bioproduct environmental sustainability analysis. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 57, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.02.008

FAO. (2020). Oilseeds, Oils & Meals - Monthly Price And Policy Update (No. 126). Fukuda, H., Kondo, A., & Noda, H. (2001). Biodiesel fuel production by transesterification of oils. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 92(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80288-7

Furumo, P. R., Rueda, X., Rodríguez, J. S., & Ramos, P. I. K. (2020). Field evidence for positive certification outcomes on oil palm smallholder management practices in Colombia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118891

Ghazali, A., & Ali, G. (2019). Investigation of key contributors of CO2 emissions in extended STIRPAT model for newly industrialized countries: A dynamic common correlated estimator (DCCE) approach. Energy Reports, 5, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.02.006

Giannetti, B. F., Agostinho, F., Eras, J. J. C., Yang, Z., & Almeida, C. M. V. B. (2020). Cleaner production for achieving the sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122127

Ilham, Z., & Nimme, F. H. (2019). Quantitative priority estimation model for evaluation of various non-edible plant oils as potential biodiesel feedstock. AIMS Agriculturen and Food, 4(2), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.3934/AGRFOOD.2019.2.303

Jamaludin, N. F., Muis, Z. A., & Hashim, H. (2019). An integrated carbon footprint accounting and sustainability index for palm oil mills. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.312

Leijten, F., Sim, S., King, H., & Verburg, P. H. (2020). Which forests could be protected by corporate zero deforestation commitments? A spatial assessment. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748- 9326/ab8158

Ma, X., Wang, C., Dong, B., Gu, G., Chen, R., Li, Y., Zou, H., Zhang, W., & Li, Q. (2019). Carbon emissions from energy consumption in China: Its measurement and driving factors. Science of the Total Environment, 648(27), 1411–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.183

Mutsaers, H. J. W. (2019). The challenge of the oil palm: Using degraded land for its cultivation. Outlook on Agriculture, 48(3), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019858720

Nathaniel, S. P. (2020). Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020- 10175-7

Nathaniel, S. P., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). Environmental management amidst energy use, urbanization, trade openness, and deforestation: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2037

Nathaniel, S. P., & Iheonu, C. O. (2019). Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Science of the Total Environment, 679, 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.011

Phuang, Z. X., Woon, K. S., Wong, K. J., Liew, P. Y., & Hanafiah, M. M. (2021). Unlocking the environmental hotspots of palm biodiesel upstream production in Malaysia via life cycle assessment. Energy, 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121206

Popovich, C. A., Pistonesi, M., Hegel, P., Constenla, D., Bielsa, G. B., Martín, L. A., Damiani, M. C., & Leonardi, P. I. (2019). Unconventional alternative biofuels: Quality assessment of biodiesel and its blends from marine diatom Navicula cincta. Algal Research, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101438

Sambodo, M. T., & Novandra, R. (2019). The state of energy poverty in Indonesia and its impact on welfare. Energy Policy, 132, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.029

Şanli, B. G., Uludamar, E., & Özcanli, M. (2019). Evaluation of energetic-exergetic and sustainability parameters of biodiesel fuels produced from palm oil and opium poppy oil as alternative fuels in diesel engines. Fuel, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116116

Santika, T., Wilson, K. A., Meijaard, E., Budiharta, S., Law, E. E., Sabri, M., Struebig, M., Ancrenaz, M., & Poh, T. M. (2019). Changing landscapes, livelihoods and village welfare in the context of oil palm development. Land Use Policy, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104073

Santika, W. G., Anisuzzaman, M., Simsek, Y., Bahri, P. A., Shafiullah, G. M., & Urmee, T. (2020). Implications of the Sustainable Development Goals on national energy demand: The case of Indonesia. Energy, 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117100

Schröder, P., Antonarakis, A. S., Brauer, J., Conteh, A., Kohsaka, R., Uchiyama, Y., & Pacheco, P. (2019). SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production – Potential Benefits and Impacts on Forests and Livelihoods. In Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765015.014

Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Sinha, A. (2019). Foreign direct Investment–CO 2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of biomass energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.282

Siregar, K., Ichwana, Nasution, I. S., Sholihati, Sofiah, I., & Miharza, T. (2020). Implementation of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for oil palm industry in Aceh Province, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 542(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/542/1/012046

Siregar, K., Sholiati, S., Sofiah, I., Miharza, T., Setyobudi, R. H., Anne, O., Wahyudi, A., Adinurani, P. G., & Mel, M. (2020). Review of Implementation Life Cycle Assessment for Biodiesel Production from Palm Oil (Elaeis guineensisJacq.) in Indonesia. In E3S Web of Conferences, 190. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019000021

Soukka, R., Väisänen, S., Grönman, K., Uusitalo, V., & Kasurinen, H. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315778730

Tan, Y. D., & Lim, J. S. (2019). Feasibility of palm oil mill effluent elimination towards sustainable Malaysian palm oil industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 111, 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.043

Viere, T. (2019). State of the Art and Future Developments in LCA. In Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92237-9_1

Wahyono, Y., Hadiyanto, H., Budihardjo, M. A., & Adiansyah, J. S. (2020). Assessing the environmental performance of palm oil biodiesel production in indonesia: A life cycle assessment approach. Energies, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123248

Yung, C. L., Subramaniam, V., & Yusoff, S. (2021). Life cycle assessment for the production of palm biodiesel. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 33(1), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2020.0080

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Paminto, A. K., Karuniasa, M., & Frimawaty, E. (2024). Optimization of palm oil biodiesel production: Environmental impact analysis and POME waste utilization. Applied Environmental Science, 2(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.61511/aes.v2i1.2024.820

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check