The buddha’s paṭiccasamuppāda: Addressing contemporary environmental development challenges through eschatological perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/lad.v2i2.2025.1499Keywords:
Buddha, development, Dharma, environment, paradigm, paṭiccasamuppādaAbstract
Background: Religion is often considered as a cause of environmental problems. In response to this pessimism, Buddhism through the philosophy of Dharma comes up as revolutionary perspective in shaping contemporary environmental development paradigm, a counter for modern Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm. This philosophy is embodied in the concept of paṭiccasamuppāda applied as “scalpel” on existing environmental problems. Mehods: This study employs a qualitative approach using library research, analyzing philosophical, religious, and environmental texts. Through content analysis of Buddhist teachings, particularly paṭiccasamuppāda, the study explores its role as an alternative paradigm for addressing environmental challenges. Findings: The findings reveal that paṭiccasamuppāda, or the law of dependent origination, provides a holistic understanding of the interconnectedness between humans and nature. Unlike the Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm, which separates the observer from the observed, paṭiccasamuppāda emphasizes relational existence and balance, fostering ecological ethics based on interdependence. This perspective reduces environmental exploitation and encourages sustainable practices. Conclusion: The study concludes that paṭiccasamuppāda serves as a transformative framework for addressing contemporary environmental issues. By shifting from a dualistic worldview to an interconnected one, it promotes a sustainable development model. Integrating Buddhist ecological ethics into environmental policies and education can contribute to a more sustainable future. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study presents paṭiccasamuppāda as a fundamental principle for reinterpreting environmental sustainability. Unlike previous research that broadly discusses Buddhist ethics, this study specifically highlights paṭiccasamuppāda as a precise analytical tool for addressing environmental issues. By bridging Buddhist philosophy and contemporary ecological challenges, this study offers a novel perspective on sustainability rooted in spiritual wisdom.
References
Armstrong, K. (2002). Buddha. Phoenix.
Bandarage, A. (2013). The Buddha’s Middle Path: Lessons for sustainability and global well-being. Development, 56(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2013.31
Breyer, D. (2012). Freedom with a Buddhist face. Sophia, 52, 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-012-0308-2
Byarugaba, G. W. (2017). Inter-religious discourse on climate change: Roman Catholic and African traditional perspectives. Ecumenical Review, 69(3), 327–335.
Capra, F. (1997). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. Bentang Budaya.
Capra, F. (2015). The systems view of life: A unifying conception of mind, matter, and life. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 11(2), 242–249. https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/503
Cavazza, E. (2014). Environmental ethics as a question of environmental ontology: Naess, Ecosophy T and Buddhist traditions. De Ethica: A Journal of Philosophical, Theological and Applied Ethics, 1(2), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.141223
Cloutier, S., Berejnoi, E., Russell, S., Morrison, B. A., & Ross, A. (2018). Toward a holistic sustainable and happy neighborhood development assessment tool: A critical review of relevant literature. Ecological Indicators, 89, 139–149.
Davis, L. S. (2016). Enacting the violent imaginary: Reflections on the dynamics of nonviolence and violence in Buddhism. Sophia, 55(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0524-2
Dhammananda, K. S. (2002). Keyakinan umat Buddha. Ehipassiko Foundation.
Faris, S. (2009). Forecast: The consequences of climate change, from the Amazon to the Arctic. Henry Holt & Company.
Forrester, J. W. (2009). Some basic concepts in system dynamics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Gaerrang. (2017). Contested understandings of yaks on the eastern Tibetan Plateau: Market logic, Tibetan Buddhism, and indigenous knowledge. Area, 49(4), 526–532. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45172098
Gianarkis, R. (2013). Spiritual but not religious: On the collection of spirituality and the creation of spiritual narrative. Religious Studies Department of Hofstra University.
Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos: Making a new science. Penguin Books.
Gunderson, R. (2016). Anomie’s eastern origins: The Buddha’s indirect influence on Durkheim’s understanding of desire and suffering. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015599627
Guth, J. L., Green, J. C., Kellstedt, L. A., & Smidt, C. E. (1993). Faith and the environment: Religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 364–382.
Jacoby, S., & Terrone, A. (2009). Buddhism beyond the monastery: Tantric practices and their performers in Tibet and the Himalayas. Brill.
Kakoty, S. (2018). Ecology, sustainability and traditional wisdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3215–3224.
Kanagy, C. L., & Willits, F. K. (1993). A greening of religion? Some evidence from a Pennsylvania sample. Social Science Quarterly, 74(3), 674–683.
Kardaš, G. (2015). On some doctrinal disputations in early Buddhist interpretations of Pratītyasamutpāda (Dependent co-arising). Synthesis Philosophica, 30(1), 113–126.
Kjellman, A. (2006). The crisis of contemporary science. Kybernetes, 35(3–4), 497–521.
Koentjaraningrat. (2000). Introduction to anthropology. Rineka Cipta.
Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & Piccolo, J. J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127.
LeVasseur, T., & Peterson, A. (Eds.). (2017). Religion and ecological crisis: The "Lynn White thesis" at fifty. Routledge.
Loyd, A. (2010). The healing code. Intermedia Publishing Group.
Meijers, E. J., & Burger, M. J. (2017). Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’. Urban Studies, 54(1), 269–291.
Menahem, S., & Love, M. (2013). Forgiveness in psychotherapy: The key to healing. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(8), 829–835.
Miller, G. T., & Spoolman, S. E. (2016). Environmental science (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Morgan, J. (2015). Emptiness and the education of the emotions. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(3), 291–304.
Ñāṇananda, K. (2015). The law of dependent arising (Paṭicca Samuppāda): The secret of bondage and release (Vol. I). Pothgulgala Dharmagrantha Dharmasravana Mādhya Bhāraya.
Nasr, S. H. (1997). The spiritual crisis in modern man. ABC International Group.
Nyanatiloka, Bodhi, & Thanissaro. (2011). Paṭiccasamuppāda: Kemunculan yang dependen. Vijjakumara.
Ogata, K. (2014). System dynamics (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Palmer, M., & Finlay, V. (2003). Faith in conservation: New approaches to religions and the environment. The World Bank.
Prakash, G. (2018). Buddhist attitude towards sustainable development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 13(1), 217–220.
Sadowski, R. F. (2017). The potential of religion in the promotion and implementation of the concept of sustainable development. Papers on Global Change, 24, 37–52.
Schaefer, H. F. (2004). The Big Bang, Stephen Hawking, and God. New College Lecture Series, 2004.
Shibley, M. A., & Wiggins, J. L. (1997). The greening of mainline American religion: A sociological analysis of the environmental ethics of the National Religious Partnership for the Environment. Social Compass, 44(3), 333–348.
Yang, N. G. (2017). Water politics and religious practices in Kangding. Himalaya: Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies, 37(1), 117–121.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hendro Putra Johannes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
