Partisipasi politik perempuan dalam kiprah dakwah partai keadilan sejahtera
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jorcs.v1i1.2024.518Keywords:
media, political participation, womenAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze PKS's strategy to build women's political participation in its da'wah activities. The crisis of democracy is rationally caused by the lack of formal participation of the community, especially women in national politics. PKS has not maximized in utilizing alternative forms of women's participation through social media to fulfill affirmative policies. The efforts made by PKS have not been maximized in utilizing the strong influence of the media effects of the 4.0 era to increase women's political participation. The theoretical reference used is the theory proposed by Aeron Davis "Citizens, media effect and public participation" (Aeron Davis, 2019: 109-129). The concept of women's political participation in political parties can be brought closer to the term Ummah. This word is repeated 64 times in the word of Allah S.W.T, which is found among others in the 3rd surah (Ali-Imran) verse 110 and the 2nd surah (al-Baqarah) verse 143 and the 3rd surah (Ali-Imran) verse 110. Khyar means the best option, found in QS. As-Shaad [38]: 47. 'Aqibah which means impact or effect which in the Qur'an is mentioned 31 times of which is found in QS. Al-A'raf [7]: 128. This research paradigm is a critical paradigm using da'wah communication approaches, political communication, political parties and women's political participation. The research method consists of a type of research, namely descriptive qualitative. From this research, it can be seen that PKS encourages women to actively participate in politics as a manifestation of healthy democracy. Political awareness is built by conducting cadres every week through Ta'lim. The media used by PKS to build women's political participation is predominantly carried out through direct communication and is still minimal in the use of social media.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business.
Asy’ari, S. (2010). Nalar Politik NU dan Muhammadiyah. LKiS.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Keterlibatan Perempuan di Parlemen (Persen), 2022. Produk-Tabel Statistik, Gender Dan Kelompok Pupulasi Khusus. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NDY0IzI=/keterlibatan-perempuan-di-parlemen.html
Cohen, C. J. (2000). The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and The Breakdown of Black Potics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 457–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2586039
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Themes for the 21st Century.
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001
Davis, A. (2019). Political Communication: A New Introduction for Crisis Times. Polity Press.
Dewey, J. (2012). The Public and Its Problems (M. L. ROGERS (ed.)). Penn State University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/j.ctt7v1gh
Dovi, S. (2002). Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do? The American Political Science Review, 96(4), 729–743. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117507
Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9iTqPrZAYX8C
Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation. Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1dt006v
Habermas, J. (2015). The Theory of Communicative Action Lifeworld and Systems, a Critique of Functionalist Reason, (Vol. 2). Polity Press.
Huda, M. D., & Dodi, L. (2020). RETHINKING PERAN PEREMPUAN DAN KEADILAN GENDER: Sebuah Konstruksi Metodologis Berbasis Sejarah dan Perkembangan Sosial Budaya. CV Cendekia Press.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659
Kleden, & Ignas. (2003). Analisis CSIS. Jurnal CSIS, XXXII(2).
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke (Vol. 14, Issue 56). Clarendon Press.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787
Mulyono, I. (2010). Penguatan Keterwakilan Perempuan di Legislatif. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/akd/dokumen/makalah_STRATEGI_MENINGKATKAN_KETERWAKILAN_PEREMPUAN__Oleh-_Ignatius_Mulyono.pdf
Noelle-Neumann, E. (2014). The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion--Our Social Skin (C. T. Salmon, W. Donsbach, & Y. Tsfati (eds.)). Routledge.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. University of California Press.
Rehfeld, A. (2006). Towards a General Theory of Political Representation. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.x
Strolovitch, D. Z. (2007). 1Introduction. In D. Z. Strolovitch (Ed.), Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics (p. 0). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226777450.003.0001
Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.
