Divine stewardship: Developing an ecological vision from Ibn ʿArabī’s metaphysics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v4i1.2026.4164Keywords:
al-futuhat a-makkiyah, devine stewardship, khalifah, Ibn ʿArabī, TajallīAbstract
Background: Contemporary Islamic ecological scholarship has increasingly examined the environmental implications of Islamic cosmology and Sufi metaphysics. Although previous studies have explored concepts such as tajallī, khalīfah, and the spiritual significance of nature, the relationships among divine manifestation, human embeddedness in the cosmos, and ethical responsibility warrant further systematic articulation. This study develops divine stewardship as a contemporary analytical framework derived from an ecological interpretation of Ibn ʿArabī’s metaphysics. Methods: The study employs a qualitative textual-interpretive design grounded in philosophical hermeneutics. Fifteen purposively selected textual units from al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya, drawn from fifteen chapters, were examined through contextual reading, iterative interpretation, and thematic synthesis. The analysis distinguishes concepts expressed in the primary text from the ecological interpretations and theoretical constructs developed by the authors. Findings: The analysis identifies eight textual components concerning divine manifestation, the spiritual character and transformation of the cosmos, human–earth relations, reciprocal influence, balance, vicegerency, and servanthood. These findings are synthesized into a tripartite framework comprising ontological, anthropological, and ethical dimensions. The framework connects the divine grounding and interdependence of existence with humanity’s position within the created order and the ethical implications of human agency. Divine stewardship articulates this relationship as responsible human participation under divine sovereignty, oriented toward kamāl al-ʿubūdiyyah (the perfection of servanthood). Conclusion: The study contributes a parsimonious conceptual framework for interpreting the ecological implications of Ibn ʿArabī’s metaphysics. Its contribution lies in systematizing the relationships among divine manifestation, human embeddedness, and ethical responsibility without attributing a modern ecological theory to Ibn ʿArabī. The framework provides a basis for further comparative textual research and critical engagement with contemporary Islamic environmental ethics.
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Alikhani, E., & Legenhausen, H. M. (2018). Nearness to Allah. Religious Inquiries, 7(14). https://doi.org/10.22034/ri.2018.80582
Alsaigh, R., & Coyne, I. (2021). Doing a hermeneutic phenomenology research underpinned by Gadamer’s philosophy: A framework to facilitate data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820
Asghari̇, S. (2021). Sufism and challenges of modern and secular philosophy: Nasr’s perspective. Türk Kültürü ve Haci Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi, 98, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.34189/hbv.98.011
Ayada, S. (2017). The doctrine of divine names in Ibn ’Arabi. A theological & philosophical Iissue. Revue de Theologie et de Philosophie, 149(1–2), 125–139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45465686
Beyers, J. (2016). What does religion have to say about ecology? A new appraisal of naturalism. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 15(45), 96–119. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/59442
Çakmaktaş, B. (2026). Ecosufism in the thought of Ibn ʿArabī and Rūmī: Unity, nature and ecological ethics in Sufi metaphysics. Religions, 17(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020237
Chittick, W. C. (2015). The self-disclosure of God: Principles of Ibn al-ʿArabī’s cosmology. State University of New York Press.
Christenson, D., & White, C. (Eds.). (2024). Sublime cosmos in graeco-roman literature and its reception: Intersections of myth, science and history (1st ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350344709
Croi, A. D. L., Stoffels, M., & Grijpma, J. W. (2024). Behind the scenes of qualitative analysis: Learning from new researchers’ struggles. In Starting Research in Clinical Education (pp. 175–180). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105044417487&partnerID=40&md5=9949f968e73da7389fbdd2123d6a1bff
Debesay, J., Nåden, D., & Slettebø, Å. (2008). How do we close the hermeneutic circle? A Gadamerian approach to justification in interpretation in qualitative studies. Nursing Inquiry, 15(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2008.00390.x
Doko, E. (2026). From combination to individuation: A sufi–sadrian case for the metaphysical possibility of strong AI. Religions, 17(5), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17050575
Douglas, H. (2022). Sampling Techniques for qualitative research. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds.), Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 415–426). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_29
Erdoğan, İ. H., & Eryücel, S. (2024). The concept of divine revelation according to Ibn Sînâ and Al-Ghazālī: A comparative analysis. Religions, 15(11), 1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111383
Fikri, F. T. R., Fanani, Z., Kusuma, D., Imam, M. F. N., & Ubaidillah, M. H. (2024). Significance of Sufism in environmental sustainability: Eco-Sufism movement in Islamic boarding school. IJIBS, 2(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.35719/ijibs.v2i2.49
Fraser, L. K., & Jarvis, S. W. (2025). Epidemiological research, including big data. In I. J. Higginson, E. Bruera, M. Costantini, D. Currow, P. J. Larkin, & N. Preston (Eds.), Research Methods in Palliative, Supportive, and End-of-Life Care (2nd ed., pp. 114–127). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191924644.003.0011
Gada, M. Y. (2024). Islam and environmental ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Grössl, J., & Stosch, K. V. (Eds.). (2021). Impeccability and temptation: Understanding Christ’s divine and human will (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367618933
Naseem, H. M., & Gürbüz, M. (2026). The human–nature relationship in the mind of Yunus Emre: A mystical reading on amanah consciousness. Religions, 17(5), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17050554
Haq, M. Z., Mutis, B. E., & Philips, G. (2025). Religion and contemporary ecology: Laudato Si and Ibn Arabi’s eco-spirituality in the perspective of open integrity. Progresiva: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 14(01), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v14i01.38032
Hill, E. M., An, M., Kivlighan, D. M., & Gelso, C. J. (2024). A tripartite model of the psychotherapy relationship: Interrelations among its components and their unfolding across sessions. Psychotherapy, 61(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000521
Hillebrand, H. (2019). Dominance. In Encyclopedia of Ecology: Volume 1-4, Second Edition (Vol. 3, pp. 302–308). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11158-3
Ibn ʿArabī. (1911). Al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya (Vol. 1–1). Al-Maṭbaʿah al-Maymaniyyah.
Irawan, B., Latif, M. S. A., & Nasution, I. F. A. (2022). Green sufism argument as environmental ethics (philosophical analysis). Religia, 25(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v25i1.4164
Irawan, B., Nasution, I. F. A., & Coleman, H. (2021). Applying Ibn ʿArabī’s Concept of Tajallī: A Sufi approach to environmental ethics. Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism, 10(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.21580/tos.v10i1.7204
Iyer, B. (2023). The Transimmanence of the real: Ontological pluralism in the school of Ibn ʻArabī. Religions, 14(7), 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070923
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
Karjoo-Ravary, A. (2023). Mapping the unseen: Ibn al-ʿArabī’s maps in Chapter 371 of al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya. Journal of Sufi Studies, 12(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105956-12341336
Koca, O. (2020). The world as a theophany and causality: Ibn ʿArabī, causes and freedom. Sophia, 59(4), 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0621-x
Lala, I. (2025). Christian Perspectives on imago Dei and Ibn ʿArabī’s theologization of the natural world. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 36(4), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2026.2624267
Lee, H., Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinner, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P., Trisos, C., Romero, J., Aldunce, P., & Barret, K. (2023). IPCC, 2023: Climate change 2023: Synthesis report, summary for policymakers. Contribution of working groups i, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [core writing team, h. Lee and j. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC.
Macagno, F. (2022). Coding relevance. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 36, 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100349
Mwita, K. (2022). Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(6), 618–625. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1920
Rahayu, N. W. S., Joyo, P. R., Binawati, N. W. S. (2025). The conservation of the white cattle of Taro as a representation of Prāṇī-Dharmavalues, biodiversity preservation, and religious heritage. Dharmakirti: International Journal of Religion, Mind, and Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v3i1.2025.2308
Obaideen, K., & Alnidawi, I. S. (2025). Earth and the environment: Islam and stewardship. Contemporary Islamic Perspectives in Public Health, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009231268
Önal, M. V., & Kanber, R. M. (2025). Toprağin iki farkli sesi: Âşik veysel ve âşik mahzuni şerif’in kara toprak temali şiirlerinde ideoloji ve müzikal uyum analizi. Yegah Müzikoloji Dergisi, 8(4), 3471–3499. https://doi.org/10.51576/ymd.1813558
Padela, A. I. (2025). Terms of engagement. In J. Tham, J. Lunstroth, & S. Advani, Multicultural and religious perspectives on protecting the environment, the biosphere, and biodiversity (1st ed., pp. 186–189). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003632726-21
Panggayuh, B. P., Putri, C. D. F., Az-zahra, F. K., Azizah, N. N., Putri, N. S. S., & Zakirah, R. A. (2025). Khilafah dan amanah sebagai dasar etika ekologis dalam islam: Analisis konseptual terhadap tanggung jawab manusia terhadap lingkungan. Muqaddimah, 16(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.71247/b6f5kq06
Rozi, S. (2019). Uderstanding the Concept of Ecosufism: Harmony and the Relationship of God, Nature and Humans in Mystical Philosophy of Ibn Arabi. Ulumuna, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v23i1.354
Salles, R. (Ed.). (2021). Cosmology and biology in ancient philosophy: From thales to Avicenna (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108873970
Salvaggio, F. (2020). Paretymologies in the Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam in the light of Ibn ʿArabī’s hermeneutic principles. Kervan. International Journal of Afro-Asiatic Studies, V. 24 N. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/5164
Sayari, S., Mamat, M. Z., & Hasbullah, M. (2019). Image of god and image of human being: A philosophical investigation of the god-human and human-machine relationships. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2019-0015
Sayem, Md. A. (2023). Islam and environmental ethics: A qur’anic approach. In S. S.-M. Kwan & W.-Y. Chow (Eds.), Asian Spiritualities and Social Transformation (pp. 263–276). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2641-1_15
Vincenti, D. (2016). “Green” Islam and social movements for sustainability. LUISS University Guido Carli
Wafiyah, N. H. I. (2026). Environmental jurisprudence (Fiqh al-Bi’ah): Formulating islamic legal responses to the contemporary ecological crisis through the lens of maqasid al Shari’ah. Al Hukm: Journal of Islamic Legal Studies, 1(01), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.65097/jils.v1i01.140
Ismail, H. W., & Berghout, A. (2024). The concept of al-istikhlaf and its importance in reclaiming the attributes of man as khalifah on earth. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.vi.1930
White, L. (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science, New Series, 155(3767), 1203–1207. http://jstor.org/stable/1720120
Winiwarter, V., & Blum, W. E. H. (2017). Religious aspects of soil—human relationships. In Encyclopedia of Soil Science (pp. 1903–1906). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ESS3-120044721
Yiğit, M. (2025). Tasavvuf müziğinde nefes: Nefes-i rahmânî’den müzikal icraya. Yegah Müzikoloji Dergisi, 8(4), 4084–4104. https://doi.org/10.51576/ymd.1815663
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Izdiyan Muttaqin, Nurwahidin, S. Salahudin Suyurno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
