Why do religious practices diverge despite shared origins and destinations? A comparative study of Pongal among two South Indian communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v4i1.2026.4016Keywords:
diaspora, group boundaries, Hinduism, multi-ethnic state, transnational networksAbstract
Background: This study compares Pongal among the Nattukottai Chettiars and Peranakan Indians in Melaka, who share origins in Hindu merchant groups of the South Indian Tamil cultural sphere, examining associations between religious practices and social relationships. Methods: Fieldwork in Melaka, Malaysia, from 2019 to 2025 combined participant observation in households and Hindu temples, interviews, and documentary research. Temple observations, participants’ accounts, and documentary materials supplemented uneven household observations. Findings: Pongal differed in participants, languages, offerings, and rituals. Among the Nattukottai Chettiars, celebrations primarily involved same-caste relatives and community members; Tamil was used at temples, and offerings and rituals reflected South Indian practices. Among the Peranakan Indians, ethnically diverse participants communicated mainly in Malay during temple activities. Bhogi ancestral rites incorporated local foodways and elements participants associated with Chinese cultural influence; offerings were shared across ethnic and religious backgrounds. Rituals and offerings also varied among Peranakan Indian households in relation to differences in social relationships. Conclusion: These differences suggest associations with same-caste endogamy, caste-based temple governance, and continuing networks with South India among the Nattukottai Chettiars, and with interethnic marriage, more inclusive temple governance, and expanding relationships with local society among the Peranakan Indians. However, these associations are ethnographic interpretations limited by observational coverage. Novelty/Originality of this article: Based on ethnographic fieldwork, this study compares two communities sharing cultural and religious origins and a destination but differing in social relationships. Its originality lies in relating differences in participants, languages, offerings, and rituals of the same festival to differences in marriage, temple governance, and ties with local society and South India.
References
Ammerman, N. T. (2016). Lived religion as an emerging field: An assessment of its contours and frontiers. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 29(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1890-7008-2016-02-01
Dhoraisingam, S. S. (2006). Peranakan Indians of Singapore and Melaka: Indian Babas and Nonyas—Chitty Melaka. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Fadzli, A., & Siti Khatijah, Y. (2017). Sensitiviti agama dalam hubungan masyarakat pelbagai kaum di Malaysia. In International Conference on Empowering Islamic Civilization. https://cendekia.unisza.edu.my/neuaxis-e/Record/6500/Details
Hymavathi, P. (1993). Festivals and medical relevance (with special reference to medieval Andhra society). Bulletin of the Indian institute of history of medicine, Hyderabad, 23(2), 113–123. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11639482/
Imyarova, Z. (2019). The peculiarities of traditional marriage rituals of the Dungan diaspora: A comparative-historical analysis. Nationalities Papers, 47(3), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2018.13
Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. (2025). Anggaran penduduk semasa Malaysia, 2025. https://storage.dosm.gov.my/demography/population_2025.pdf
Kanagaraj, V., Venigalla, S., & Prasad, G. P. (2023). Pongal’s heritage: An Ayurvedic perspective. Journal of Indian Medical Heritage, 2(4), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.4103/jimh.jimh_41_24
Kandasamy, S. S., & Rajantheran, M. (2019). Festivals and religious practices of Melaka Chetties among Malaysian Tamils. Journal of Tamil Peraivu, 2, 152–159. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/tamilperaivu/article/view/21343
Kashiwa, M. (2025a). Cultivating respect and trust: The inclusive coexistence between Peranakan Indians and Chinese in Malaysia—Exploring organization, living space, and religion. Journal of Ethnic and Diversity Studies, 3(1), 1–16. https://joeds.com.my/index.php/home/article/view/60
Kashiwa, M. (柏美紀). (2025b). 多様性を包摂する集団構築はいかに可能か―マレーシア の土着化インド系移民の組織体・土地・寺院に着目して | Building Inclusive Communities: Lessons from Malaysian Localised Indian Community, Focusing on Organization, Land and Temples. 東南アジア―歴史と文化, 54, 48–67. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sea/2025/54/2025_48/_pdf
Koga, M. (古賀万由里). (2019). 開発に抗する寺院―マレーシアのヒンドゥー教をめぐる 事例から | Temples Against Development: A Case Study of Hinduism in Malaysia .宗教と社会, 25, 17–31. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/religionandsociety/25/0/25_17/_pdf
Levitt, P. (2007). God needs no passport: Immigrants and the changing American religious landscape. New Press.
Levitt, P., & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
Lim, H. C., & Jorge, F. (2006). Malacca: Voices from the street. Lim Huck Chin.
Loh, K., & Velupillay, J. (2017). The Chitties of Melaka. Department of Museums Malaysia.
Malacca Chitty Community. (1962). Trust deed of the Malacca Chitty Community.
Malacca Volunteer Social Research Association. (2022). Historical Hindu temples and worship structures in Malacca State. Research Publications.
Melaka Chetti Community. (2019). Annual report 2017–2018.
Melaka Chetti Community. (2022). Annual report 2019–2021.
Mustafar, F. W., & Badhrulhisham, A. (2021). Pesta Pongal dan Tahun Baru Cina, perayaan adat atau perayaan keagamaan? Satu toleransi agama di Malaysia. 'Abqari Journal, 25(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.33102/abqari.vol24no2.415
Nagarajan, V. (2018). Feeding a thousand souls: A ritual of generosity. In Feeding a thousand souls: Women, ritual, and ecology in India: An exploration of the kolam (Chapter 11). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195170825.003.0011
Naiker, B. S. (1976). Sejarah Kaum Chitty Melaka. Sri Poyatha Venayagar Moorthi Temple.
Narinasamy, K. (1983). The Melaka Chitties. In K. S. Sandhu & P. Wheatley (Eds.), Melaka: The Transformation of a Malay Capital, c. 1400–1980 (Vol. 2, pp. 239–263). Oxford University Press.
Pejabat Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan. (2019). Al-Afkar #39: Muslim menyertai Pesta Pongal. https://www.muftiwp.gov.my/ms/artikel/al-afkar/3062-al-afkar-39-muslim-menyertai-pesta-pongal
Raghavan, R. (1977). Ethno-racial marginality in West Malaysia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 133(4), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90002605
Somasundaram, R. (2017). Arranged marriage in Malaysia among millennial Nagarathar Nattukottai Chettiars. University of Arizona.
Sri Mutthu Mariamman Temple. (1997). Saalai Kiraha Kumbabishega Vinnyabanam Souvenir Magazine.
Sri Poyatha Venayagar Moorthi Temple. (2022). Melaka and the Melaka Chetti or Melaka Chitty community of the town of Melaka: Proposed rules and by-laws.
Torii,T. (鳥居高). (2010). マレーシア―アファーマティブ・アクションと経済発展. 片山 裕・大西裕(編), アジアの政治経済・入門(新版)| An Introduction to Asian Politics and Economics, New(pp. 186–203). 有斐閣.
Tweed, T. A. (2006). Crossing and dwelling: A theory of religion. Harvard University Press.
Vertovec, S. (2000). The Hindu diaspora: Comparative patterns. Routledge.
Wimmer, A. (2008). The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), 970–1022. https://doi.org/10.1086/522803
Wong, J., & Neo, D. (2023). The Melaka Chetti Kitchen: Culinary Journey of 500 Years. Chetti Heritage Association of Malaysia.
Yamamoto,H. (山本博之). (2008). プラナカン性とリージョナリズム――マレーシア・サ バ州の事例から | Peranakan-ness and Regionalism: A Case Study of Sabah, Malaysia.. 地域研究, 8(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.24638/jcasreview.8.1_52
Yanagisawa,K. (栁澤究). (2008). インドの伝統的都市における都市構造の形成と居住空 間の変容に関する研究―ヴァーラーナシーとマドゥライを事例として | A Study on the Formation of Urban Structure and the Transformation of Residential Space in Traditional Indian Cities: Case Studies of Varanasi and Madurai.
Yule, H., & Burnell, A. C. (1886). Hobson-Jobson: A glossary of colloquial Anglo-Indian words and phrases, and of kindred terms, etymological, historical, geographical and discursive. John Murray.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Miki Kashiwa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














