Analysis of the three fundamental frameworks of Hindu: Karya Agung Mamungkah Wrhespati Kalpa Utama Ngenteg Linggih at Pura Agung Mpu Kuturan Singaraja

Authors

  • Ketut Agus Nova Mpu Kuturan State Hindu Religious Institute, Buleleng, Bali 81119, Indonesia
  • I Gusti Ngurah Sudiana I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa State Hindu University Denpasar, Denpasar, Bali 80237, Indonesia
  • Ni Gusti Ayu Kartika I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa State Hindu University Denpasar, Denpasar, Bali 80237, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v3i2.2026.2378

Keywords:

Karya Agung, Mungkah Wrhaspati Kalpa Utama, Ngenteg Linggih, three basic frameworks of Hinduism

Abstract

Background: This study examines the implementation of the Karya Agung Mamungkah Wrhaspati Kalpa Utama Ngenteg Linggih at Pura Agung Mpu Kuturan, Institut Agama Hindu Negeri (IAHN) Mpu Kuturan Singaraja, through the analytical framework of the Three Basic Frameworks of Hinduism (Tattwa, Susila, and Acara). The research is motivated by the temple’s “floating” functional status, which does not fully conform to traditional classifications such as Kahyangan Jagat, Kawitan, or Swagina temples, yet accommodates a large-scale and complex ritual typically associated with universal-scale temples. Methods: Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews with key informants including religious leaders, lecturers, students, and institutional authorities, as well as document analysis. The data were analyzed using an interactive model involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, guided by the analytical framework of Tattwa, Susila, and Acara and supported by relevant sociological and religious theories. Findings: The findings reveal that the implementation of the ceremony is grounded in a conceptual synthesis that positions the campus temple as a hybrid form integrating elements of Kahyangan Jagat and Swagina. The ritual procession, guided by sacred texts such as Lontar Bhama Kertih, includes preparatory stages, core rituals such as Mecaru, Melaspas, and Melasti, culminating in Ngenteg Linggih as the installation of divine presence, and concluding with Masineb. This ritual has a multifaceted impact: it strengthens spirituality through experiential learning, fosters social solidarity (ngayah), enhances institutional quality and student engagement, and preserves cultural continuity across generations.  Conclusion: The study concludes that the Karya Agung functions not merely as a ritual activity but as a transformative mechanism that integrates spirituality, institutional development, and cultural preservation within the context of higher education. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study introduces the concept of the campus temple as a “spiritual laboratory,” offering an innovative integrative model of Tattwa–Susila–Acara within modern higher education institutions.

References

Ambara, I. G. A. N. P. (2006). Eksistensi tanah-tanah milik pura desa pakraman di Kota Denpasar. Program Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Diponegoro.

Ardiyani, L. P. C., Pitriani, K., & Jero, N. W. J. (2025). Rejang Pedawa dance as a medium for ethnopedagogical-based adolescent learning. Dharmakirti: International Journal of Religion, Mind and Science, 2(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v2i2.2025.1311

Ardiyasa, I. N. S., Kurniawan, M. F., & Anggraini, P. M. R. (2024). Pura Agung Mpu Kuturan: Textual review and its implications in the formation of academic character based on ethnopedagogy. Mimbar Ilmu, 29(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v29i2.75423

Bryda, G., & Costa, A. P. (2023). Qualitative research in digital era: Innovations, methodologies and collaborations. Social Sciences, 12(10), Article 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100570

Dharma, N. K. S. A., & Jero, N. W. J. (2025). Agama 4.0: Inovasi kecerdasan buatan dalam pendidikan, dakwah, dan konseling rohani. Produktif dengan AI: Transformasi profesi di Indonesia (pp. 249–272).

Donder, I. K. (2006). Brahmavidya: Teologi kasih semesta (kritik terhadap epistemologi teologi, klaim kebenaran, program misi, komparasi teologi dan konversi). Paramita.

Heriyanti, K. (2019). Pura sebagai bentuk penerapan konsep ketuhanan Saguna Brahma. Jnanasiddhanta: Jurnal Teologi Hindu, 1(1). http://jurnal.stahnmpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/jnanasidanta/article/view/346/305

Humble, N., & Mozelius, P. (2022). Content analysis or thematic analysis: Similarities, differences and applications in qualitative research. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (ECRM 2022) (pp. 76–81). https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.21.1.316

Jemiwi, J., & Dharma, N. K. S. A. (2025). Hidup selaras dengan dharma: Langkah kembali ke rumah jiwa. PT. Dharma Pustaka Utama.

Jero, N. W. J., Jha, G. K., Kashiwa, M., & Paul, S. (2025a). Embodying the divine in Bali: Gender, ritual authority, and the politics of representation in Hinduism. Dharmakirti: International Journal of Religion, Mind and Science, 3(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v3i1.2025.2306

Jero, N. W. J., Lochan, A., Surpi, N. K., & Seriadi, S. L. N. (2025b). Corpse exposure and cosmological ecology: Ritual, space, and death in an indigenous mortuary landscape. Life and Death: Journal of Eschatology, 3(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.61511/lad.v3i1.2025.1952

Listriani, N. K., Yasa, I. K. W., & Putra, A. P. D. (2019). Tradisi Ngusaba Gedebong sebagai media penyuluhan nilai-nilai Tri Kerangka Dasar Agama Hindu terhadap masyarakat. Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 2(2). https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/kamaya/article/view/283

Nathanson, C. A. (2009). Problems, crises, events and social change: Theory and illustrations. Sociological Research Online, 14(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1974

Pitriani, N. R. V. (2020). Tattwa dalam yajna perspektif filsafat Hindu (Siwa Tattwa) bagi masyarakat Hindu di Bali. Śruti: Jurnal Agama Hindu, 1(1).

Purwanto, H., Surpi, N. K., Virgiastuti, M. A. D. I., & Jero, N. W. J. (2025). Siwa–Buddha sebagai strategi transformasi keagamaan: Membaca bukti material dan tekstual pada masa Bali kuno. Humanis, 29(4), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2025.v29.i04.p04

Puspa, I. A. T., & Saitya, I. B. S. (2021). The function of Ngenteg Linggih ceremony in Pejaten Tabanan. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.37329/jpah.v5i2.1274

Putra, I. G. D. D. (2021). Ajaran Tri Kerangka Dasar Agama Hindu dalam tradisi Ngampin Kumpi di Desa Lembongan. Maha Widya Bhuwana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Agama dan Budaya, 4(2), 65–70. https://jurnal.stahnmpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/bhuwana/article/view/1622/1231

Sudarsana, I. B. (2000). Ajaran agama Hindu (filsafat yajna). Yayasan Dharma Acarya.

Suhardana, K. M. (2010). Sundarigama: Sumber sastra rerahinan Hindu seperti Galungan, Kuningan, Purnama, Tilem dan lain-lain. Paradigma.

Sukrawati, N. M. (2018). Pendidikan Acara agama Hindu: Antara tradisi dan modernitas. Dharmasmrti: Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Kebudayaan, 18(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.32795/ds.v9i2.145

Swastika, I. K. P. (2008). Arti dan makna puja Tri Sandhya, Panca Sembah. CV Kayumas Agung.

Titib, I. M. (2003a). Teologi dan simbol-simbol dalam agama Hindu. Paramita.

Titib, I. M. (2003b). Teologi dan simbol-simbol dalam agama Hindu (Vol. 1). Paramita.

Virgiastuti, M. A. D. I., Pareek, A., Purwanto, H., & Jero, N. W. J. (2026). Between mokṣa and nirvāṇa: Archaeological traces of Siwa–Buddha harmony in Bali and their eschatological worldview. Life and Death: Journal of Eschatology, 3(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.61511/lad.v3i2.2026.3114

Widana, I. G. K. (2018). Aktivitas ritual umat Hindu, antara reproduksi identitas dan religiositas (perspektif teologi kontemporer). Dharmasmrti: Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Kebudayaan, 18(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32795/ds.v9i2.141

Widana, I. G. K. (2019). Filosofi ritual Hindu: Pergeseran antara konsep dan konteks. Dharmasmrti: Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Kebudayaan, 10(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.32795/ds.v19i2.435

Wiana, I. K. (2007). Konsep Hindu tentang pelestarian lingkungan (kearifan lokal dalam pengelolaan lingkungan hidup). UPT Penerbit Universitas Udayana.

Zuriah, N. (2007). Metodologi penelitian sosial dan pendidikan: Teori-aplikasi. Bumi Aksara.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

Nova, K. A., Sudiana, I. G. N., & Kartika, N. G. A. (2026). Analysis of the three fundamental frameworks of Hindu: Karya Agung Mamungkah Wrhespati Kalpa Utama Ngenteg Linggih at Pura Agung Mpu Kuturan Singaraja. Dharmakirti : International Journal of Religion, Mind and Science, 3(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.61511/ijroms.v3i2.2026.2378

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check