Techno-economic analysis of geothermal green hydrogen: Investment validation through green accounting framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/ecoprofit.v4i1.2026.2744Keywords:
geothermal energy, green hydrogen, green accounting, Monte Carlo Simulation, techno-economic analysisAbstract
Background: Indonesia faces a significant economic dilemma in aligning its growth targets with the 2060 net-zero emission (NZE) commitment, particularly within the geothermal sector which holds immense potential yet suffers from an investment paradox due to perceived high risks. While the geological reserves are abundant, the translation into bankable energy projects remains sluggish. This study aims to bridge this gap by validating the financial viability of geothermal-based green hydrogen production through a standardized techno-economic framework integrated with green accounting principles. Methods: The research proposes a hybrid Aakaline water electrolysis and solid oxide electrolysis cell (AWE-SOEC) system to maximize efficiency from stable geothermal baseloads. The methodology employs a rigorous techno-economic analysis (TEA) and a Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations to quantify investment risks and internalize environmental externalities such as carbon credits and oxygen by-products valuation. Findings: The findings demonstrate a highly competitive levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) at a median of $4.77 per kg. Furthermore, the project projects a net present value (NPV) of US$95.1 million with an intiernal rate of return (IRR) of 49.6% along with a rapid payback period of 3.1 years that far exceeds standard industry hurdle rates. The stochastic analysis reveals a 98.2% probability of positive returns. Conclusion: Integrating green accounting metrics transforms the economic calculation from simple cost analysis into a comprehensive investment validation. The study proves that geothermal hydrogen is not only technically feasible due to thermal integration but also presents a premium profitability profile, suggesting that environmental compliance can be leveraged as a value driver for accelerating Indonesia's energy transition. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study integrates a techno-economic analysis, incorporating a novel AWE-SOEC hybrid electrolyzer configuration and a 10,000-iteration Monte Carlo simulation that internalizes environmental externalities, to produce the first probabilistic investment validation framework for geothermal-based green hydrogen in Indonesia.
References
Abba, Z. Y. I., Balta-Ozkan, N., & Hart, P. (2022). A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112305
Anya, B., Mohammadpourfard, M., Akkurt, G. G., & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. (2025). Exploring geothermal energy based systems: Review from basics to smart systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 210. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115185
Armijo, J., & Philibert, C. (2020). Flexible production of green hydrogen and ammonia from variable solar and wind energy: Case study of Chile and Argentina. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(3), 1541–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.028
Bastarrica, F., Li, R., Mak-Hau, V., & Gorji, S. A. (2025). Levelized Cost of Hydrogen from offtakers standpoint: An overlooked perspective via case studies in Warrnambool, Australia. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150558
Bendato, I., Cassettari, L., Mosca, M., & Mosca, R. (2016). Stochastic techno-economic assessment based on Monte Carlo simulation and the Response Surface Methodology: The case of an innovative linear Fresnel CSP (concentrated solar power) system. Energy, 101, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.048
Brilian, V. A., Purba, D. P., Adityatama, D. W., Larasati, T., al Asy’ari, M. R., Erichatama, N., Caesaria, T. T., & Khasani. (2025). Technical initiatives to develop low-medium temperature geothermal resources in Indonesia: Lessons learned from the United States. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213720
Cao, D., Hassan, H., & Sampene, A. K. (2025). Decoding sustainability success: The role of environmental management accounting and environmental management initiatives under institutional pressure. Journal of Environmental Management, 392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126789
Dincer, I., & Acar, C. (2014). Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(34), 11094–11111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035
Fan, J. L., Yu, P., Li, K., Xu, M., & Zhang, X. (2022). A levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison of coal-to-hydrogen with CCS and water electrolysis powered by renewable energy in China. Energy, 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.123003
Gerged, A. M., Zahoor, N., & Cowton, C. J. (2024). Understanding the relationship between environmental management accounting and firm performance: The role of environmental innovation and stakeholder integration – Evidence from a developing country. Management Accounting Research, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100865
Hanif, S., Ahmed, A., & Younas, N. (2023). Examining the impact of Environmental Management Accounting practices and green transformational leadership on corporate environmental performance; the mediating role of green process innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137584
IRENA. (2024). Shaping Sustainable International Hydrogen Value Chains. International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2024/Sep/IRENA_Shaping_sustainable_hydrogen_value_chains_2024.pdf
IRENA. (2025). Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction Scaling Up Electrolysers to Meet The 1.5°C Climate Goal. International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Dec/IRENA_Green_hydrogen_cost_2020.pdf
Kassem, M. A., Moscariello, A., & Hollmuller, P. (2025). Navigating risk in geothermal energy projects: A systematic literature review. Energy Reports, 13, 696–712. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.12.052
Kim, H., Song, G., & Ha, Y. (2025). Green hydrogen export potential in each Southeast Asian country based on exportable volumes and levelized cost of hydrogen. Applied Energy, 383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125371
Kim, H., Song, G., & Ha, Y. (2025). Green hydrogen export potential in each Southeast Asian country based on exportable volumes and levelized cost of hydrogen. Applied Energy, 383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125371
Kim, T., Oh, S., Kim, D., & Park, J. (2025). Achieving near-zero emissions and cost-effective hydrogen production through the Allam cycle and solid oxide electrolysis cells integration. Energy, 335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138071
Lahrichi, A., el Issmaeli, Y., Kalanur, S. S., & Pollet, B. G. (2024). Advancements, strategies, and prospects of solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs): Towards enhanced performance and large-scale sustainable hydrogen production. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 94, 688–715. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2024.03.020
Lee, B., Cho, H. S., Kim, H., Lim, D., Cho, W., Kim, C. H., & Lim, H. (2021). Integrative techno-economic and environmental assessment for green H2 production by alkaline water electrolysis based on experimental data. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106349
Li, Y., Hao, J. shuo, & Zhou, Y. (2025). Economic analysis of different hydrogen production routes under a CO2 pricing mechanism – A levelized cost of hydrogen based study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 128, 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.185
Muthia, R., Pramudya, A. S. P., Maulana, M. R., & Purwanto, W. W. (2024). Techno-economic analysis of green hydrogen production by a floating solar photovoltaic system for industrial decarbonization. Clean Energy, 8(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae032
Nasruddin, Alhamid, I. M., Daud, Y., Surachman, A., Sugiyono, A., Aditya, H. B., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2016). Potential of geothermal energy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 733–740. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.032
Nur, S., Burton, B., Aida, N., & Ikhwali, M. F. (2023). Determining optimal incentives for geothermal projects procured within PPP framework under the tariff constraints. Renewable Energy Focus , 45, 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.02.006
Pambudi, N. A., & Ulfa, D. K. (2024). The geothermal energy landscape in Indonesia: A comprehensive 2023 update on power generation, policies, risks, phase and the role of education. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114008
Poh, J., Tjiawi, H., Chidire, A., Veerasamy, B. B., Massier, T., Romagnoli, A., Wu, W., Lu, D., Lim, J. W. M., Yang, L., & Chuah, K. E. C. (2025). Geothermal development in South, Southeast and East Asia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 209. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115043
Rahman, M. M., Saha, S., & Hoque, M. (2024). Unveiling the link between environmental management accounting, energy efficiency, and accountability in state-owned enterprises: An integrated analysis using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Environmental Challenges, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100832
Raza, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, M. A., Alharthi, Y. Z., Faheem, M., Haider, R., & Kumar, L. (2025). Power generation expansion planning with high penetration of geothermal energy – Potential, prospects and policy. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100614
Robin, H. M., Chowdhury, C. R., Tahmid Boni, S. F., Hossain, M. S., Amin Rahman, M. al, Hossain, M. I., Aziz, M., & Mourshed, M. (2025). Emerging application of solid oxide electrolysis cells in hydrogen production: a comprehensive analytical review and life cycle assessment. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101226
Sharmin, T., Khan, N. R., Akram, M. S., & Ehsan, M. M. (2023). A State-of-the-Art Review on Geothermal Energy Extraction, Utilization, and Improvement Strategies: Conventional, Hybridized, and Enhanced Geothermal Systems. International Journal of Thermofluids, 18. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100323
Sisodia, G. S., Soares, I., & Ferreira, P. (2016). Modeling business risk: The effect of regulatory revision on renewable energy investment - The Iberian case. Renewable Energy, 95, 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.076
Smith, C., Hill, A. K., & Torrente-Murciano, L. (2020). Current and future role of Haber-Bosch ammonia in a carbon-free energy landscape. Energy and Environmental Science, 13(2), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee02873k
Sugiharti, L., Akter, S., Das, M. K., Pattak, D. C., Esquivias, M. A., & Akter, S. (2025). Population dynamics, economic growth, energy mix, and environmental pollution in ASEAN: Exploring the role of renewable, nuclear, and nonrenewable energy using the CCEMG approach. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100598
Tang, Y., & Li, Y. (2024). Comparative analysis of the levelized cost of hydrogen production from fossil energy and renewable energy in China. Energy for Sustainable Development, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101588
Vargas-Payera, S. (2024). Heat in the news: Geothermal energy in Chilean newspaper coverage. Renewable Energy, 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121509
Wahid, M. N., Asif, M., Khan, M. I., & Khalid, M. (2025). A strategic analysis of geothermal energy for sustainable energy transition: Case study from Indonesia. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101303
Wang, Y., Li, G., Liu, Z., Cui, P., Zhu, Z., & Yang, S. (2019). Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen process in comparison with coal-to-hydrogen process. Energy, 185, 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.119
Wolf, N., Tanneberger, M. A., & Höck, M. (2024). Levelized cost of hydrogen production in Northern Africa and Europe in 2050: A Monte Carlo simulation for Germany, Norway, Spain, Algeria, Morocco, and Egypt. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 69, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.319
Zhou, P., Luo, J., Cheng, F., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2021). Analysis of risk priorities for renewable energy investment projects using a hybrid IT2 hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with alpha cuts. Energy, 224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120184
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fitra Reza Fadhilah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
