Time and cost efficiency analysis of shotcrete and retaining wall methods for landslide disaster mitigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/andmej.v3i2.2026.3285Keywords:
cost, shotcrete, retaining wallAbstract
Background: The construction industry in Indonesia, particularly in the city of Yogyakarta, is experiencing rapid development along with the increasing demand for educational infrastructure. In projects that involve challenging topographical conditions, the selection of an appropriate earth retaining structure method becomes a critical technical and managerial decision. This study aims to compare the cost and time efficiency between two widely used methods in retaining wall construction, namely the conventional masonry retaining wall method and the shotcrete method, in the Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta development project. Methods: The analysis focuses on direct and indirect costs, project duration, productivity, and critical path determination using the Critical Path Method (CPM). Data were obtained from project planning documents, detailed engineering drawings, Bill of Quantities (BoQ), and scheduling data developed using Microsoft Project. Findings: The results of the analysis indicate that the shotcrete method provides significant advantages in terms of time efficiency, with a project duration of approximately 358 working days, which is 42 days faster than the retaining wall method requiring around 400 working days. However, from the cost perspective, the shotcrete method results in higher total expenses, amounting to Rp15.526 billion compared to Rp15.187 billion for the retaining wall method, or approximately 2.24 percent more expensive. Additional analysis of indirect costs shows that the longer duration of the retaining wall method increases monthly overhead expenses, while the shotcrete method requires higher technical and equipment costs. Conclusion: Therefore, the retaining wall method is considered more economical, whereas the shotcrete method is superior when project acceleration is prioritized. The findings of this study provide practical guidance for project managers and decision makers in selecting the most appropriate method based on project objectives, budget limitations, and time constraints. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study uniquely combines cost, time, productivity, and CPM analysis to provide an integrated evaluation of masonry and shotcrete retaining wall methods, offering practical decision-making guidance for complex construction projects.
References
Agha, Z. Al. (2020). KEKUATAN ANTARA DINDING PENAHAN TANAH DUA TINGKAT DAN BANGUNAN EKSISTING ( SATU TINGKAT ) ( Studi Kasus : Embung Sokoagung , Pati , Jawa Tengah ). 11–29.
Andreas Sjölander. (2020). Structural behaviour of shotcrete on irregular hard rock surfaces. Shotcrete: Elements of a System, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10545-5
Chin, L. S., & Hamid, A. R. A. (2015). The practice of time management on construction project. Procedia Engineering, 125, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.006
de Silva,K. S. U., & Perera, B. A. K. S. (2023). Spatial factors contributing to worker time management at construction sites. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 20(2), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.58278/0.2023.17
Dhamdhere, D. R., Rathi, V. R., & Kolase, P. K. (2022). Design and Analysis of Retaining Wall. International Journal of Management, Technology And Engineering, February.
Duarte, G., Gomes, R. C., de Brito, J., Bravo, M., & Nobre, J. (2020). Economic and technical viability of using shotcrete with coarse recycled concrete aggregates in deep tunnels. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10082697
Ervianto, W.I. (2004). Teori-Aplikasi Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Hardiyatmo, H. C. (2018). Penanganan Tanah Longsor dan Erosi. Edisi ke-2. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi, 2002, Manajemen Sumber daya Manusia, Grasindo Jakarta
Guo, H. L., Li, H., & Skitmore, M. (2010). Life-Cycle Management of Construction Projects Based on Virtual Prototyping Technology. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742- 597X(2010)26:1(41)
Kong, S. M., Oh, D. W., Lee, S. Y., Jung, H. S., & Lee, Y. J. (2021). Analysis of reinforced retaining wall failure based on reinforcement length. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-021-00143-6
Liu, G., Zhao, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, C., & Xu, Q. (2021). Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Shotcrete under High Temperature. Applied Sciences, 11(19), 9043. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199043 Mahyuddin, Ritnawati, Fatmawaty Rachim, E., Mursalim, Pandarangga, A. P.,
Ulfiyati, Yuni, Sidiq, Rustam, & Rosytha, A. (2023). Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi 2023. In Yayasan Kita Menulis (Issue August).
Naf'an, A. K., Zubaidi, T., & Astuti, R. W. (2019). Analisis Risiko Keterlambatan Proyek Konstruksi Akibat Perubahan Desain dan Kondisi Lapangan. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil dan Lingkungan, 4(2), 99-108.
Nugroho, A. J. (2021). Tinjauan Produktivitas Dari Sudut Pandang Ergonomi. http://eprints.uty.ac.id/8829/%0Ahttp://eprints.uty.ac.id/8829/1/BUKU-Tinjauan Produktivitas-Pak Andung - edit.pdf
Plamenco, D. A. D., Germar, F. J., & Caparros, P. M. (2021). Application of Discrete Event Simulation in Estimating Productivity of Shotcrete Method in Divider Wall Construction. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(3 Special Issue), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.03.004
Putra, A., Septanto, D., & Praja, S. (2018). PENANGANAN DAERAH RAWAN LONGSOR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SHOTCRETE. II(November), 34–39.
Rakasyiwi, G. R., Witjaksana, B., & Tjendani, H. T. (2022). the Literature Review of Construction Project Scheduling Methods and Effectiveness for the Last 5 Years in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Technology, Engineering, and Information System (Ijateis), 1(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.55047/ijateis.v1i3.446
Rijanto, B. (2020). Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Jakarta: Penerbit EGC. (Buku Teks/Referensi Ilmiah).
Rinaldi. (2021). PEKERJAAN PEMASANGAN BATU KALI PADA DINDING PENAHAN TANAH ANTARA STANDAR PUPR28-2016 DENGAN LAPANGAN ( ANALYSIS COMPARISON OF WORK OF RIVER STONES INSTALATION ON WALL BETWEEN Fauzan Rinaldi ( ANALYSYS COMPARISON OF WOR OF RIVER STONES INSTALATION ON WAAL. 2021. Santosa, B. 2008. Manajemen Proyek Konsep dan Implementasi, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sari, U. C., Sholeh, M. N., & Hermanto, I. (2020). The stability analysis study of conventional retaining walls variation design in vertical slope. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1444(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1444/1/012053
Semiawan, C. R. (2010). METODE PENELlTlAN KUALlTATlF: JENIS, KARAKTERISTIK, DAN KEUNGGULANNYA. PT Grasindo, 171.
Shehu, S. (2021). a Review of Time Management Factors in Construction Project Delivery. Journal of Project Management Practice, 1(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmp.vol1no2.3
Soewinarti, A., Soehardi, F., & Setyawan, A. D. (2020). Analisis Hubungan Antara Faktor-Faktor Keterlambatan dan Kualitas Proyek Konstruksi di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Intekna, 20(2), 115-124.
Subakti, H., Chamidah, D., Siregar, R., Saputro, A., & Kuswadi, S. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Issue September).
Suharno, A. (2020). Aplikasi Shotcrete untuk Perkuatan Lereng dan Struktur Bawah Tanah: Keuntungan dan Tantangannya. Jurnal Teknik Sipil X, Y(Z), Halaman. Wignjosoebroto Sritomo., 1992,”Teknik Tata Cara dan Pengukuran Kerja” Penerbit PT.Guna Widya, Jakarta
Wijaya, F., Pratama, I., & Wibowo, S. (2021). Perbandingan Efektivitas Biaya antara Dinding Penahan Tanah Pasangan Batu dan Shotcrete pada Proyek Pembangunan Jalan. Jurnal Infrastruktur, 11(1), 45-56. LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1 Foto Proyek Lampiran 2 DED Proyek Lampiran 3 Data Uji Tanah Bar Chart Talud Bar Chart Shotcrete PDM Talud PDM SHOTCRETE
ACI Committee 506. (2016). ACI PRC-506-16: Guide to Shotcrete (ACI 506R-16). American Concrete Institute.
Berg, R. R., Christopher, B. R., & Samtani, N. C. (2009). Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes (FHWA-NHI-10-024). Federal Highway Administration.
Gui, M.-W., & Rajak, R. P. (2024). A Numerical Study of a Soil-Nail-Supported Excavation Pit Subjected to a Vertically Loaded Strip Footing at the Crest. Buildings, 14(4), 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040927
Akis, E., Cebeci, I., & Yildiz, A. (2023). Optimum Cost Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Retaining Walls. Buildings, 13(10), 2409. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102409
Lazarte, C. A., Elias, V., Espinoza, R. D., & Sabatini, P. J. (2015). Soil Nail Wall Reference Manual (FHWA-NHI-14-007). Federal Highway Administration.
Qiao, P., & Zhou, Z. (2017). Best Practices of Using Shotcrete for Wall Fascia and Slope Stabilization (Phase I Study) (WA-RD 870.1). Washington State Department of Transportation.
Steindl, F. R., Galan, I., Baldermann, A., Sakoparnig, M., Briendl, L., Juhart, J., Thumann, M., Dietzel, M., Röck, R., Kusterle, W., & Mittermayr, F. (2020). Sulfate durability and leaching behaviour of dry- and wet-mix shotcrete mixes. Cement and Concrete Research, 137, 106180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106180
Storrie, A. D., & Bartlett, P. (2001). Wet shotcrete trial. The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 101(4), 189-202.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Aulia Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
