Time and cost efficiency analysis of shotcrete and retaining wall methods for landslide disaster mitigation

Authors

  • Muhammad Aulia Rahman Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia
  • Taufik Dwi Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/andmej.v3i2.2026.3285

Keywords:

cost, shotcrete, retaining wall

Abstract

Background: The construction industry in Indonesia, particularly in the city of Yogyakarta, is experiencing rapid development along with the increasing demand for educational infrastructure. In projects that involve challenging topographical conditions, the selection of an appropriate earth retaining structure method becomes a critical technical and managerial decision. This study aims to compare the cost and time efficiency between two widely used methods in retaining wall construction, namely the conventional masonry retaining wall method and the shotcrete method, in the Universitas AMIKOM Yogyakarta development project. Methods: The analysis focuses on direct and indirect costs, project duration, productivity, and critical path determination using the Critical Path Method (CPM). Data were obtained from project planning documents, detailed engineering drawings, Bill of Quantities (BoQ), and scheduling data developed using Microsoft Project. Findings: The results of the analysis indicate that the shotcrete method provides significant advantages in terms of time efficiency, with a project duration of approximately 358 working days, which is 42 days faster than the retaining wall method requiring around 400 working days. However, from the cost perspective, the shotcrete method results in higher total expenses, amounting to Rp15.526 billion compared to Rp15.187 billion for the retaining wall method, or approximately 2.24 percent more expensive. Additional analysis of indirect costs shows that the longer duration of the retaining wall method increases monthly overhead expenses, while the shotcrete method requires higher technical and equipment costs. Conclusion: Therefore, the retaining wall method is considered more economical, whereas the shotcrete method is superior when project acceleration is prioritized. The findings of this study provide practical guidance for project managers and decision makers in selecting the most appropriate method based on project objectives, budget limitations, and time constraints. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study uniquely combines cost, time, productivity, and CPM analysis to provide an integrated evaluation of masonry and shotcrete retaining wall methods, offering practical decision-making guidance for complex construction projects.

References

ACI Committee 506. (2016). Guide to shotcrete (ACI 506R-16). American Concrete Institute. https://www.concrete.org

Akis, E., Cebeci, I., & Yildiz, A. (2023). Optimum cost prediction of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. Buildings, 13(10), 2409. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102409

Armengaud, J., Casanova, P., Buffo-Lacarrière, L., Aubert, J.-E., & Bertron, A. (2017). Characterization of fresh dry-mix shotcrete and correlation with rebound. Construction and Building Materials, 131, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.090

Berg, R. R., Christopher, B. R., & Samtani, N. C. (2009). Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes (FHWA-NHI-10-024). Federal Highway Administration. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi10024/

Chen, L., Chen, X., Wang, X., Wang, J., & Wang, H. (2017). Numerical simulation for optimizing the nozzle of moist-mix shotcrete machine. Journal of Measurements in Engineering, 5(4), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.21595/jme.2017.19212

Chin, L. S., & Hamid, A. R. A. (2015). The practice of time management on construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 125, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.006

de Silva, K. S. U., & Perera, B. A. K. S. (2023). Spatial factors contributing to worker time management at construction sites. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 20(2), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.58278/0.2023.17

Duarte, G., Gomes, R. C., de Brito, J., Bravo, M., & Nobre, J. (2020). Economic and technical viability of using shotcrete with coarse recycled concrete aggregates in deep tunnels. Applied Sciences, 10(8), 2697. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082697

Elkliny, A. F., Ibrahim, M. E., Younes, A., & Gomaa, M. A. (2023). Time–cost–quality tradeoff considering resource-scheduling limits and multiskilling strategy. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 76, 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.06.054

Ervianto, W. I. (2004). Teori-aplikasi manajemen proyek konstruksi. Andi.

Guo, H. L., Li, H., & Skitmore, M. (2010). Life-cycle management of construction projects based on virtual prototyping technology. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2010)26:1(41)

Hardiyatmo, H. C. (2018). Penanganan tanah longsor dan erosi (2nd ed.). Gadjah Mada University Press. https://ugmpress.ugm.ac.id/id/product/teknik-sipil/tanah-longsor-erosi-kejadian-dan-penanganan

Hendrickson, C. (1989). Project management for construction: Fundamental concepts for owners, engineers, architects, and builders. Prentice Hall. https://www.cmu.edu/cee/projects/PMbook/

Jasoor, W. M., & Khaleel, T. A. (2024). Prediction model for bridge retaining walls construction productivity rate utilizing the multiple linear regression technique. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3106, 020006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0236558

Kelley Jr, J. E. (1961). Critical-path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis. Operations research, 9(3), 296-320. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.9.3.296

Kelley Jr, J. E., & Walker, M. R. (1959, December). Critical-path planning and scheduling. In Papers presented at the December 1-3, 1959, eastern joint IRE-AIEE-ACM computer conference (pp. 160-173). https://doi.org/10.1145/1460299.1460318

Kong, S. M., Oh, D. W., Lee, S. Y., Jung, H. S., & Lee, Y. J. (2021). Analysis of reinforced retaining wall failure based on reinforcement length. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-021-00143-6

Liu, G., Zhao, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, C., & Xu, Q. (2021). Mechanical properties and microstructure of shotcrete under high temperature. Applied Sciences, 11(19), 9043. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199043

Mishchenko, V., Yushyn, O., Romanyuk, M., Chyrva, A., Kostyria, I., & Matushko, Y. (2024). Shotcreting with cement–sand mixtures under the influence of electrostatic treatment. Buildings, 14(10), 3325. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103325

Moayyeri, N., Bahreininejad, A., & Hajfathalian, A. (2019). Cost-based optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining walls considering different bearing-capacity methods. Mathematics, 7(12), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121232

Naf’an, A. K., Zubaidi, T., & Astuti, R. W. (2019). Analisis risiko keterlambatan proyek konstruksi akibat perubahan desain dan kondisi lapangan. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil dan Lingkungan, 4(2), 99–108. https://rumahjurnal.unej.ac.id/journal/jurnal-rekayasa-sipil-dan-lingkungan/

Plamenco, D. A. D., Germar, F. J., & Caparros, P. M. (2021). Application of discrete event simulation in estimating productivity of shotcrete method in divider wall construction. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(3), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.03.004

Project Management Institute. (2021). The standard for project management and a guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). https://www.pmi.org/standards/pmbok

Qiao, P., & Zhou, Z. (2017). Best practices of using shotcrete for wall fascia and slope stabilization (Phase I Study) (WA-RD 870.1). Washington State Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32893

Rakasyiwi, G. R., Witjaksana, B., & Tjendani, H. T. (2022). The literature review of construction project scheduling methods and effectiveness for the last 5 years in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Technology, Engineering, and Information System, 1(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.55047/ijateis.v1i3.446

Sari, U. C., Sholeh, M. N., & Hermanto, I. (2020). The stability analysis study of conventional retaining walls variation design in vertical slope. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1444(1), 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1444/1/012053

Shehu, S. (2021). A review of time management factors in construction project delivery. Journal of Project Management Practice, 1(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmp.vol1no2.3

Sjölander, A. (2020). Structural behaviour of shotcrete on irregular hard rock surfaces. In Shotcrete: Elements of a system (pp. 11–19). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10545-5

Steindl, F. R., Galan, I., Baldermann, A., Sakoparnig, M., Briendl, L., Juhart, J., Thumann, M., Dietzel, M., Röck, R., Kusterle, W., & Mittermayr, F. (2020). Sulfate durability and leaching behaviour of dry- and wet-mix shotcrete mixes. Cement and Concrete Research, 137, 106180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106180

Storrie, AD & Bartlett, P. (2001). Wet shotcrete trial. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 101(4), 189-202. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA0038223X_2670

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Rahman, M. A., & Dwi, T. (2026). Time and cost efficiency analysis of shotcrete and retaining wall methods for landslide disaster mitigation. ASEAN Natural Disaster Mitigation and Education Journal, 3(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.61511/andmej.v3i2.2026.3285

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check